Canadian Universities and the Abolition of Ethics? A modest proposal for restoration

The novel effect of World War II was the creation of formal, official – and lasting! – union between the intellectual and national government…The marriage of university and government took place then… 

Robert Nisbet, The Twilight of Authority

Concerned for my colleagues, staff and students excommunicated by Brock University, and the well-being of those compelled to submit to a medical therapeutic, I posed some questions on January 18, 2022 to Dr. Lynn Wells, at the time Interim-President of Brock University. She did not reply. Undaunted, I resent the letter – still no reply. Finally, I sent the same letter to the newly installed President, Dr. Lesley Rigg, on December 19, 2022. This time, I Cc’d the VP of research, Dr. Tim Kenyon, and the Provost V-P Academic, Dr. Lynn Wells. Still, no reply. 

Here, unaltered, is the text of my request for information:

Dear Dr. Wells,

I hope this message finds you well.

  I am deeply disappointed at your compliance with the unlawful prime ministerial coercion of Canadians to submit to experimental drug treatment. 

  As a member of the Brock community and a Canadian citizen affirming my civil, criminal and human rights please provide responses to the following:  

  1. Identify the Act of Parliament or statute law, which cannot be overridden by any provincial act or statute, that authorizes you to compel any member of the Brock community to submit to experimental medical treatment over and above protected rights not limited to: 
  1. free and informed consent and freedom from coercion and inducement specified in the Tri-Council Policy Statement Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, 2018 (https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique_tcps2-eptc2_2018.html
  2. privacy of the patient-physician relationship, and c) criminal code protection from physical assault and threats? 
  1. On numerous occasions you have identified the contents of the COVID-19 experimental injection ‘product’ as “safe”. Please detail:
    1. the ingredients of the injections and any known adverse effects 
    2. whether the ingredients are independently verified
    3. what reporting system your claim of “safety” is based on and 
    4. if Brock University uses an active or passive adverse events reporting system? 
  2. You have ensured students in residence through the “COVID-19 Informed Consent – Living in residence” of the risks of COVID-19 and their liability. Have you equally ensured members of the Brock community are provided knowledge of their right to informed consent and the right not to be subject to coercion, threat or inducement to take COVID-19 injections?
  3. You have threatened and have gone through with depriving members of the Brock community of employment, access to education and services. You have also contributed to discrimination and stigmatization of non-injected persons contrary to national and international human rights law. Please specify the provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms you rely on to deprive members of the Brock community of employment, access to education and services? 

Sincerely,

Tamari Kitossa, Ph.D.

As a place of advanced learning, research, and work, the University and academicians are in liberal democracies, but only in theory, a bulwark against state-sponsored tyranny and corporate malevolence. This proposition rests on the tradition of the (quasi) autonomous Medieval University, much like the chartered self-governing towns and the Church as sanctuary. Probably the most famous incident of an intellectual bucking political authority, that of King Henry II, but only to uphold another, that of Pope Alexander III, is the ‘turbulent priest’ Thomas Becket. Romanticism aside, academics no doubt owe to Becket the prerogative of tenure – which is the protected right to speak truth to power. Debate, free and open inquiry protected by academic freedom, and collegial governance, these are the hallmarks which, in principle, guarantee that the University serves more than the corporate class and the State and which expropriates tax tribute from citizens to fund it. To be clear, taken too far from context, this ideal of the University conceals its vital function as a site of clerical power which sustains the State in whatever its form (e.g., bureaucratic, capitalist, colonialist, imperialist, racist, theocratic), as shown by the likes of Robert Michels and Milovan Djilas.

Indeed, as noted by Linda McKay-Panos of the Alberta Civil Liberties Research Centre, the University’s relationship to the Canadian State, as judged by the courts, is a complicated one. As Universities have capitulated to the federal Government’s medical dictatorship, which in any case exceeds its remit over the provincial responsibility of ‘health care’, it is an open question whether anything remains of Universities’ traditional prerogative of autonomy. There is no question that the lion’s share of that which the University produces first goes to Government, which then farms those benefits out to the far-flung reaches of the State: external (i.e., military) and domestic apparati of physical violence (i.e. police and prisons), the courts which maintain the status quo, various ‘service’ agencies for pacification by ‘caring’, and, not least public ‘education’ charged with propagandizing the young. 

A sprawling, vast and constantly growing tenticular patchwork of bureaucracy, overseen by unelected administrators, serves the State in disbursing the benefits of knowledge generated by the University. Through dual action the State serves itself in the expropriation of knowledge and colludes with corporate interests and their big shareholders – making it now difficult to discern where the State ends and corporations begin. And to ensure the concentration of power and wealth – as much as an unsuspecting or uncaring citizenry will allow itself to be bamboozled by State racketeering – the range of freedoms and liberties gets smaller and smaller. This process is a self-evident fact as the global hegemons and their satellites collectively collude under the cover of an ‘emergency’ march in lockstep to ratchet-up tyranny. It makes no difference that a third global war is underway as this den of thieves race to grab for themselves what is left from their planetary depredation the past 150 years. 

Though it is overly-romantic and radically naïve, the image of the University as beacon on the hill is both potent and worth fighting for. This, especially now that it is fully captured by the State. In such a context, as noted by Robert Nisbet, the ideal of the ‘ivory tower’ is a myth propagandized by the clerisy of power who seek to stand off as philosophers, prostitutes really, offering ‘impartially’ generated knowledge (to the highest bidder – the State). To be sure, students and the professoriate across Canada are resisting: here and here among other places.    Yet, nothing is more political than knowledge, and hence the University is a place of politics. But, contrary to the theatre and explicit political partisanship found in Parliament, it is by making the politics of knowledge explicit, while seeking to restrain partisanship that the University makes available to Canadians a forum where ideas, policies and practices can be scrutinized. The Republic of Letters and Nullius Inverba – “On No One’s Word” – are ideals of radical democracy that ought to indict the guilty conscience of those in academia who have capitulated the hard won prerogative of tenure. Let me be clear about my radical naïvité: I do not dispute the basic facts of what Charles Mills calls materializing race in Kehinde Andrews’s account in the New Age of Empire of how colonial and slavery provided the material lubricant for the development of the Western knowledge complex. 

I suggested in my first post that Justin Trudeau’s CoVID-19 coercive measures amount to a declaration of war on the Canadian people, with the aim of abrogating the Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Indeed, neither Canadian courts nor human rights commissions have defended the Constitution, Charter and the various laws and policies that are based on the non-negotiable ethical and legal framework set out by the Nuremberg Code of Medical Ethics. When corruption, cynical appeal to cherished values and tyranny breaks out in the State’s open warfare on citizens, who does the University serve? What is the vision and ideal of the university in the context of political tyranny? When and how is democratic restraint on runaway scientific inquiry – especially that of bioweaponry, ‘transhumanism’ and ‘compulsory moral bioenhancement’ – possible? This is not, after all, fascist Italy or Nazi Germany where the academic community by and large were complicit. Or is it?

Since the State has declared war on the citizenry, under the principle of ‘command responsibility’, what fiduciary obligation do University administrator’s owe faculty, students, staff and the Canadian people to resist the criminal and unconstitutional conduct of a State executive which issues unlawful commands and whose purpose is to abrogate constitutional democracy itself? If this question seems rhetorical, let me assert its practical relevance. At Universities across Canada, and indeed the world, that faculty members, staff and students have either died suddenly or have come down with debilitating and, in some cases, mysterious diseases. Whether and what role a bioengineered ‘virus’ and its countermeasure play requires transparency and free and open scholarly debate and inquiry. The question of responsibility cannot long be avoided. Whether this mortality and morbidity results from the federal Governments draconian anti-health policies, which includes the CoVID-19 injections, or ‘natural causes’ cannot be known since there is NO effort to establish the facts of the matter. Yet “excess” deaths from 2020 to 2022, which the Canadian government stopped counting in Week 34 of 2022 indicate something is amiss. The rise of deaths in Alberta due to ‘cause unknown’, the sudden rise of debilitating illnesses that are likely the result of ‘antibody-dependent enhancement’(ADE), the proliferation of myocarditis and pericarditis and fertility problems as suggested by Byram Bridle, among other things, raises serious questions as to risk/benefit for an entirely experimental therapeutic. Indeed, the British Journal of Medicine has called for an end to the injection campaign and lockdown measures. In an unsparing two-part series in the Journal of Insulin Resistance, Aseem Malhotra has destroyed the corrupt and expedient side-stepping of best research practice for safety and efficacy of the ‘novel’ mRNA therapeutic. He points to lockdowns, ‘regulatory capture’ and the inalienable right of free and informed consent here, here, and, here as causing inestimable harm.

For how long can the University administrators and Board of Trustees avoid answering for their complicity with the legalized criminality of Justin Trudeau’s federal government? Can they pretend for much longer that the lineal descendants of the Nuremburg Code – which in theory guides research at Brock and other Universities – means nothing? Are there not documents aplenty, some of them directly issued by the federal government which prohibit medical tyranny? (see: the Tri-Council Policy Statement for Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans on Research Ethics,  the Brock University Responsible Conduct of Research Policy and Section III: C 2 of Brock University’s Faculty Handbook pertaining to Research Ethics). What will it take to bring these complicit administrators to their senses? Personal injury law suits against arising from “sudden deaths” and/or debilitating injuries? Though hopefully not, will it be from personal grief if the plague of corruption, as Judy Mikovits calls it, visits them? 

Whatever the case may, there can be no pretense that Brock University, or any Canadian university for that matter, has manifestly failed their communities, the nation and the tradition of the Universities autonomy. The administrative class of the University, Boards of Trustees, faculty unions and associations and not a small number of the professoriate have marched in lock-step with the great ratchet-up. All is not lost, though. There is a way out of this morass to be taken by all the malefactors in the University – and this modest proposal will take us deeper into principle of the University as autonomous and firmly grounded in the non-negotiability of ethics and consent: apologize; confess; be transparent; repent; compensate those harmed; and, have the fortitude to ensure that “Never Again” MEANS “Never Again”!

Consent to Treatment: An absolutist perspective on bodily and mind in public policy and the law in Ontario

Introduction

Ontario’s Medical Officer of (Ill)Health has exerted pressure on physicians not to write letters of accommodation for medical, religions or conscience. His is doing is nothing short of an abuse of authority, breach of public trust, a violation of the Hippocratic oath and criminal intervention in the patient-physician relationship. Who will fact check him? Who elected him? Who will discipline and dismiss him? Doug Ford? Hardly! Justin (This-is-the-only-way-out) Trudeau? We know where Trudeau stands on the law and public policy of consent: he has brushed these guaranteed protections aside to satisfy the globalist anti-state sovereignty agenda.

But, what is the law and policy of consent regarding research ethics and medical therapies/treatment?

To begin with, I encourage readers to read the Canadian Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans (Canada) issued by the federal, yes, that is what it says, the FEDERAL government of Canada:

https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique_tcps2-eptc2_2018.html. But where does the Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons stand? And What is the law of consent related to medical therapies and procedures?

Canadians and their loved ones have been coerced, induced and threatened by the prime minister and provincial and municipal ‘leaders’ to undergo and experimental and therapeutic medical procedure. This came/comes at the expense of their incomes, ability to move freely and to congregate. So what is the law and policy that are used to justify not only the draconian overreach of the prime minister and his provincial lackeys but also which is supposed to guide the practice of the medical establishment? I decided to check whether the College of Physicians and Surgeons Ontario (CPSO) has any hidden policy directive that intimidates and threatens physicians from their obligation to: a) provide free and informed consent to treatment, b) abide by the decisions of their patients and c) to provide letters of accommodation upon request. The person I spoke to at the CPSO Friday April 1, 2022, told me there is NO such directive to physicians from the CPSO. Again, I was told there are NO hidden CPSO policies to limit the autonomy of physicians in respect to patient consent, patient rights and letters of accommodation.

I was, moreover, told that if I have any concerns/questions about this messaging that I should contact the Ministry of (Ill)Health which sets public policy. It is worth noting that the minister, the medical officer and Ministry of (Ill)Health do not have the power to discipline physicians and surgeons – this is done by the tribunal of the CPSO where physicians who violate the law and conditions and terms of their licence. The reality is that the Ministry of (Ill)Health cannot, under any circumstances, supercede the law of consent derived from the 1945-1946 Nuremberg Trials which set out a code of medical ethics that is the framework for medical practice and research worldwide. No one outside the regulating body has the authority to direct physicians and surgeons as to how to practice medicine: not the Chinese dictatorship-loving Justin Trudeau (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVusYrv2jIU), Doug Ford or the Ontario Medical Officer of (Ill)Health. Physicians cannot withhold writing letters of accommodation UNLESS they have a clinical justification! In that case, the patient may seek a second, or even third opinion! And in all cases, patients can refuse treatment on clinical reasons, religion or conscience. To be clear, according to the representative at the CPSO I spoke to there are NO (secret) policies at the CPSO preventing physicians from writing letters of accommodation.

In this post, my aim is to demonstrate that the right of autonomy against coercive medical therapy is prohibited by law, conventions and professional ethics in Ontario and Canada (and, if one can have any confidence in the UN, everywhere else in the world for that matter).

Pages from the College of Physicians and Surgeons Ontario.

Here are choice quotes DIRECTLY from the CPSO’s documents and the law of consent in Ontario to this effect:

Consent to Treatment:

  • https://www.cpso.on.ca/Physicians/Policies-Guidance/Policies/Consent-to-Treatment
  • Policies of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (the “College”) set out expectations for the professional conduct of physicians practising in Ontario. Together with the Practice Guide and relevant legislation and case law, they will be used by the College and its Committees when considering physician practice or conduct.
  • Within policies, the terms ‘must’ and ‘advised’ are used to articulate the College’s expectations. When ‘advised’ is used, it indicates that physicians can use reasonable discretion when applying this expectation to practice.
  • Treatment: Anything that is done for a therapeutic, preventative, palliative, diagnostic, cosmetic, or other health-related purpose, and includes a course of treatment, plan of treatment, or community treatment plan.
  • Capacity: A person is capable with respect to a treatment if they are able to understand the information that is relevant to making a decision and able to appreciate the reasonably foreseeable consequences of a decision or lack of decision. Capacity to consent to a treatment can change over time, and varies according to the individual patient and the complexity of the specific treatment decision.

Policy

General Expectation

  1. Physicians must be aware of, and comply with, all of the requirements in the

          Health Care Consent Act, 1996 (HCCA).

  • Physicians must obtain valid consent before a treatment is provided…

Obtaining Consent

  • For consent to be valid, physicians must ensure that it:
    • Is obtained from the patient, if they are capable with respect to treatment, or from the patient’s SDM, if the patient is incapable with respect to treatment.
    • Relates to the specific treatment being proposed.3
    • Is informed.
    • Is given voluntarily and not under duress.
      • If physicians believe that consent is not being freely given, they must ensure that there has been no coercion.
    • Is not obtained through misrepresentation or fraud.
      • Physicians must be frank and honest when interacting with patients, including when conveying information about the proposed treatment.
  • To ensure that consent is informed, physicians must:
    • provide information about the nature of the treatment, its expected benefits, its material risks and material side effects, alternative courses of action and the likely consequences of not having the treatment prior to obtaining consent, which includes:
      • providing information that a reasonable person in the same circumstances would require in order to make a decision about the treatment;
      • considering the specific circumstances of the patient, on a case-by-case basis, and using their clinical judgment in determining what information to provide; and
      • providing information relating to material risks that are relevant for a broad range of patients and those that are particularly relevant for the specific patient;
    • engage in a dialogue with the patient or the SDM (as the case may be) about the information specified in 7.a., regardless of whether physicians use supporting documents (such as consent forms, patient education materials or pamphlets) to facilitate the provision of this information;
    • provide a response to requests for additional information about the treatment; and
    • be satisfied that the information provided is understood and, as such, take reasonable steps to facilitate the comprehension of the information provided.
      • While a physician proposing treatment may delegate the act of obtaining consent to another health-care provider, they must be assured that the health-care provider has the knowledge, skill, and judgment required to obtain consent.
      • If unsure about whether the consent obtained is valid, physicians must not provide the treatment until assured that valid consent has been obtained.

The CPSO also provides this on their website: “COVID-19 FAQS FOR PATIENTS”:

https://www.cpso.on.ca/en/Public/Services/Patient-Help-Centre/COVID-19-FAQs-for-Patients

  • CPSO strongly encourages all eligible Ontarians to receive a COVID-19 vaccine and booster shot(s) as recommended by your family physician. Immunization is widely recognized as one of the most effective interventions for reducing the impact of infectious diseases.

One notices immediately that physicians and surgeons are not given direction by the CPSO.

Information for physicians

https://www.cpso.on.ca/News/COVID-19-Updates/Information-for-Physicians

→ Nothing of relevance on this page pertains to consent or gives directives to medical practitioners

The law of consent in Ontario

The Ontario Health Care Consent Act lays out the specific grounds in law as to the issue of consent. The law can be found here: https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/96h02.

The College of Physicians and Surgeons Ontario makes it plain that medical practitioners have a legal and moral responsibility with respect to free and informed consent to medical therapies and procedures: “Physicians must be aware of, and comply with, all of the requirements in the Health Care Consent Act, 1996 (HCCA)”. Part II is of particular relevance in establishing that patients have total and absolute right over their bodies and therefore any medical therapy or procedure.

Clearly the law of consent is nationwide, and, informed by the Nuremburg trial and codes and subsequent international conventions. It is for this reason that injections or oral vaccines CANNOT be made “mandatory”. There is NO such thing as a mandatory “vaccination”: not in law, ethics or morals in Canada! Not even the Constitution can or says anything about political or administrative authority overriding bodily autonomy and right of mind. In fact, these pre and political rights are ‘doubly institutionalized’ by law in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/page-15.html.

Section 7 of the Charter is explicit that “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice”. And no “fundamental principle of justice” exists to coerece/compel a medical procedure, which if unconsented is assault by the Criminal Code of Canada. In fact, while upon arrest the police can harvest DNA swabs from the mouth, this does not rise to the matter of coercive treatment under formal detention. It is clear that sections 8, 9 and 10 of the Charter prevent medical assault, which is what unconsented medical treatment is according to the Criminal Code of Canada (see 216, 217 and 219 at https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/C-46.pdf):

8. Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.

9. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned.

10. Everyone has the right on arrest or detention

      (a) to be informed promptly of the reasons therefor;

      (b) to retain and instruct counsel without delay and to be informed of that right; and

      (c) to have the validity of the detention determined by way of habeas corpus and to be released if the detention is not lawful.

The Criminal Code also specifies at s.19 that “Ignorance of the law by a person who commits an offence is not an excuse for committing that offence”. One of the most fundamental principles of the so-called Rule of Law is that there are NO privileged exemptions from the application, enforcement and punishment by law. None are immune: not the Justin Trudeau and any in his cabinet; not any premiers; and certainly no one in an administrative capacity. All are bound by the principle of Command Authority not to obey immoral and illegal commands – no matter who from, in ‘peacetime’ or war!

Pulling the licence of physicians?

It is believed, as noted above, wrongly, that physicians/surgeons can lose their licence under the compulsion of the CPSO or the provincial medical officer of (ill)health. Some physicians for illicit conduct during the plan/scamdemic. For instance, one physician in Thornhill had his licence suspended for selling accommodation letters: https://www.thestar.com/local-newmarket/news/2022/01/31/college-of-physicians-and-surgeons-suspends-thornhill-doctor-s-licence.html?rf

Troublingly there is considerable Inquisition-style harassing of physicians and surgeons across Canada. To this end as of January 2022, 40 were/are under investigation for spreading “misinformation”: https://globalnews.ca/news/8524589/ontario-physicians-investigation-covid-19/

Conclusion

EVERYTHING from the CPSO’s own website, and, from law the law of consent in Ontario, is absolute about your right to consent to ANY treatment. No amount of coercion, lies, manipulation and mystification by Justin Trudeau and all involved in this obscene crime against humanity and the imperative of state managers to abolish formal democracy acceptable.

See the links below on ethical guidance for physicians and for knowledge of all persons. Notice that CONSENT is at the core of the responsibility of physicians:

World Medical Association 

Declaration of Geneva, 1948

Declaration of Helsinki, 1964

Declaration of Helsinki, 2018 

Declaration of Tokyo, 1975 

https://pdf-it.dev.acw.website/please-and-thank-you?url=https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-tokyo-guidelines-for-physicians-concerning-torture-and-other-cruel-inhuman-or-degrading-treatment-or-punishment-in-relation-to-detention-and-imprisonment/&pdfName=wma-declaration-of-tokyo-guidelines-for-physicians-concerning-torture-and-other-cruel-inhuman-or-degrading-treatment-or-punishment-in-relation-to-detention-and-imprisonment

Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, 2005.

Article 6 – Consent

http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

The Belmont Report.

C. Applications

Given the policy and law of consent, it is astonishing that ethicists and law professors claim the Canadian Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms have provisions that justify a so-called medical mandate, which is in effect medical assault and battery. About their ignorance of their own specialization more must be said by those more expert than myself. Nevertheless, the point of my commentary is unambiguous: Canadians MUST educate themselves about pre and political foundations for their absolute right of autonomy of body and mind from therapeutic state intervention.

THE RATIONAL SCEPTIC’S GUIDE TO THE COVID-19 ‘PLANDEMIC’

“No attempt must be made to encase man, for it is his destiny to be set free”.

Frantz Fanon. 1977. Black Skin, White Masks.

“What societies really, ideally, want is a citizenry which will simply obey the rules of society.  If a society succeeds in this, that society is about to perish”.

James Baldwin. 1964. “A Talk to Teachers”https://www.zinnedproject.org/materials/baldwin-talk-to-teachers

1. PREAMBLE

2. URGENT VIDEO/PDF VIEWS

3. RESOURCE CONTENTS

4. FREE SPEECH INFORMATION PLATFORMS AND SEARCH ENGINES

5. MEDICAL AND RESEARCH ETHICS

6. CANADIAN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW RELEVANT TO ASSSAULT, MEDICAL

    ETHICS, MEDICAL RESEARCH AND CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE

7. APPLICABLE CANADIAN LAW, PUBLIC POLICY, SUITS AND TRIBUNAL

    HEARINGS

8. CANADIAN MISRULERSHIP CLASS’S COMPLICITY WITH FOREIGN POWERS

9. CASES, SUITS, TRIBUNAL DECISIONS AND LAWYERS: CANADA

10. CANADIAN BODILY SOVEREIGNTY AND MEDICAL ETHICS INITIATIVES

11. CANADIAN CRITICAL THINKING COVID-19 NEWS AND INFORMATION SITES

12. INTERNATIONAL CLINICIANS, SCIENTISTS AND VACCINOLOGISTS

13. INTERNATIONAL CRITICAL THINKING AND INVESTIGATION

14. COVID-RELATED INTERNATIONAL LAW, RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES

15. PLANDEMIC PLANNING AND GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

16. MAD SCIENTISTS: SARS 1 AND SARS 2, INJECTION BIOWEAPON AND GAIN-OF-

      FUNCTION RESEARCH AND PATENTS

17. PCR FRAUD

18. CORPORATE/STATE MEDIA PROPANGANDA

19. WARFARE, SECRET RESEARCH OPERATIONS, LAB ‘LEAKS’, MEDICAL

      EXPERIMENTATION, RACE AND EUGENICS

20.  READINGS IN THE HISTORICAL-SOCIOLOGY OF THE ‘THERAPEUTIC STATE’

       AND MEDICALLY-INDUCED TYRANNY

  1. PREAMBLE

            Nullius in verba (On the word of no one)! Denial (plausible or otherwise), disinformation, half-truths, misinformation and outright lies, as noted by Howard Becker, are prerequisites for governments and the administrative class of the deep state (let’s not forget the espionage agencies!) to rule the masses of people. As noted by Lewis Mumford, it has been this way since the predatory military elites, with the aid of their ideologists, the clerics (i.e., intellectuals), established the first proto-states over 5500 years ago. Since then, every state formation has been a running a protection racket as Charles Tilly argued. That central administration for imposing the will of the minority on the majority is aided and abetted by a cabal banksters, oligarchs, clerics and intellectuals, the warrior caste, monarchs and politicians –all existing in fractious collusion while trampling the masses. How and why these human predators are successful is a difficult, intricate and long-debated question. I will attempt to summarize the arguments in a future post.

            For now, it can be said that all governments need help, to manufacture the fear needed to ‘persuade’ citizens to live as slaves in ‘safety’ rather than live freely with the risks and responsibility of governing themselves. But now as the corporate-owned media are exposed as stenographers for governments, the corporations (who own them) and the Finance-medical-military-industrial complex, we are truly in the midst of an information war on and for the minds, and therefore the actions, of humanity. The breadth of the criminality, deceit, fraud and malevolence with which the world’s governments (with the aid of the predator class) have tipped toward fascism and totalitarianism demands that each person doubt the claims of those in authority. To pursue truth, both hidden in plain sight and those concealed by the veil of secrecy that the predators upon humanity claim is the right of government in the name of ‘national security’, is now a key to a new, fully, human age.

            Thanks to honest and truly independent thinkers, lawyers, citizen journalists, scientists, clinicians and physicians, politicians and everyday people from all walks of life who refuse to submit to medically-driven fascism, the narrative about the bio-weapon COVID-19 ‘pandemic’and mRNA injections, biopassports, social credit and total information awareness is in tatters. Why? Because a critical mass of people refuse to give up their inalienable right to be sovereign in mind, body, movements, livelihoods and privacy. The word is that these are peoples’ rights, not the property of global oligarchists and their creatures in government, administration, the universities and the media. As the propaganda war intensifies and the people resist by providing their own means to access the truth, an information guide that provides access to legal and critical thinking resources will be an important part of the struggle. It is for this reason that I have given organization to the information I have spent 14 months accessing. I have aimed to figure out for myself where truth exists and how to identify lies. I am not interested in being ‘right’. My aim is to affirm my capacity to establish for myself where and what is truth and never to be dogmatic since there are times when even truths, robbed of their context, are lies. The “sceptics’ guide to the COVID-19 ‘plandemic’’ aims to support access to information and truth for those whose conscience, minds and bodies are their own.

            Finally, this is a ‘living’ document. It will periodically be updated as I continue my own education and make every effort to keep up with the rapidly changing events that will determine the future of humanity.

  • URGENT VIDEO/PDF VIEWS

First, the COVID Care Alliance of Canada recent analysis of the fraudulent trial practices of Pfizer:

https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/

  • More Harm Than Good – Canadian Covid Care Alliance, January 4th, 2022

https://odysee.com/@esousaonline:7/CCCA-More-Harm-Than-Good:6

  • PDF – More Harm Than Good – Canadian Covid Care Alliance, January 4th, 2022

https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/The-COVID-19-Inoculations-More-Harm-Than-Good-REV-Dec-16-2021.pdf

Second, visual display of how the mRNA “vaccine” promotes micro and large thrombosis:

or

Third, the Corona Investigative Committee’s Grand Jury Trial

  • Day 1: Opening Statements

https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-1-EN:0

Day 2: Historical Background

https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-Day-2-online_1:f

Day 3: PCR Test

https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-Day-3-en-online:7

Day 4: Injections and Psychological Warfare

https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-Day-4-online:4

Day 5: Economical and Financial Destruction

https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-Day-5-online_1:4

Day 6: Eugenics and Outlook

https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-Day-6-en-online:7

Who Is Bill Gates?

https://www.corbettreport.com/gates/

  • Part 1: How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health
  • Part 2: Bill Gates’ Plan to Vaccinate the World
  • Part 3: Bill Gates and the Population Control Grid
  • Part 4: Meet Bill Gates
  • FREE SPEECH INFORMATION PLATFORMS AND SEARCH ENGINES

FREE SPEECH INFORMATION PLATFORMS

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com

Gettr: https://gettr.com/

Odysee: https://odysee.com/

Rumble: https://rumble.com/

Spotify: https://www.spotify.com

SEARCH ENGINES

Presearch.IO

https://www.presearch.io/about

  • Presearch is a community-powered, decentralized search engine that provides better results while protecting your privacy and rewarding you when you search.
  • We believe that the best way to compete with the massive, centralized and monopolistic corporation that currently dominates search is to build a framework that enables people from all over the world to collaborate to build an op
  • MEDICAL AND RESEARCH ETHICS (ONTRIO,

CANADA AND INTERNATIONAL)

COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS ONTARIO

Consent to Treatment (bold wording in original)

https://www.cpso.on.ca/Physicians/Policies-Guidance/Policies/Consent-to-Treatment

Within policies, the terms ‘must’ and ‘advised’ are used to articulate the College’s expectations. When ‘advised’ is used, it indicates that physicians can use reasonable discretion when applying this expectation to practice.

Definitions

Treatment: Anything that is done for a therapeutic, preventative, palliative, diagnostic, cosmetic, or other health-related purpose, and includes a course of treatment, plan of treatment, or community treatment plan.

            General Expectations

  1. Physicians must be aware of, and comply with, all of the requirements in the Health Care Consent Act, 1996 (HCCA).
  2. Physicians must obtain valid consent before a treatment is provided.
  3. Patients and substitute decision-makers (SDMs) have the legal right to refuse, withhold, or withdraw consent to a treatment, and physicians must respect this decision even if they do not agree with it.

            Obtaining Consent

            6.     For consent to be valid, physicians must ensure that it:

                        a. Is obtained from the patient, if they are capable with respect to treatment, or

                            from the patient’s SDM, if the patient is incapable with respect to treatment.

                        b. Relates to the specific treatment being proposed.

                        c. Is informed.

                        d. Is given voluntarily and not under duress.

                            i. If physicians believe that consent is not being freely given, they must ensure

                               that there has been no coercion.

                        e. Is not obtained through misrepresentation or fraud.

                            i. Physicians must be frank and honest when interacting with patients,

                               including when conveying information about the proposed treatment.

            7. To ensure that consent is informed, physicians must:

                        a. provide information about the nature of the treatment, its expected benefits, its

                           material risks and material side effects, alternative courses of action and the

                           likely consequences of not having the treatment prior to obtaining consent,

                           which includes:

  1. providing information that a reasonable person in the same circumstances would require in order to make a decision about the treatment;
    1. considering the specific circumstances of the patient, on a case-by-case basis, and using their clinical judgment in determining what information to provide; and
  1. providing information relating to material risks that are relevant for a broad range of patients and those that are particularly relevant for the specific patient;
  2. engage in a dialogue with the patient or the SDM (as the case may be) about the information specified in 7.a., regardless of whether physicians use supporting documents (such as consent forms, patient education materials or pamphlets) to facilitate the provision of this information;
  3. provide a response to requests for additional information about the treatment; and
  4. be satisfied that the information provided is understood and, as such, take reasonable steps to facilitate the comprehension of the information provided.

            8. While consent can be either express or implied, physicians are strongly advised to

                 Obtain express consent, particularly when the treatment is likely to be more than

                 mildly painful, carries appreciable risk, will result in ablation of a bodily function, is a

                surgical procedure or an invasive investigative procedure, or will lead to significant

                changes in consciousness.

  • While a physician proposing treatment may delegate the act of obtaining consent to another health-care provider, they must be assured that the health-care provider has the knowledge, skill, and judgment required to obtain consent.
  • If unsure about whether the consent obtained is valid, physicians must not provide the treatment until assured that valid consent has been obtained.

            Documenting Consent

            20. Physicians must document in the patient’s record information regarding consent to

                 treatment where the treatment is likely to be more than mildly painful, carries

                 appreciable risk, will result in ablation of a bodily function, is a surgical procedure or

                 an invasive investigative procedure, or will lead to significant changes in

                 consciousness.

THE BELMONT REPORT.

Office of the Secretary Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research; The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research

https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/the-belmont-report-508c_FINAL.pdf

            C. Applications

            1. Informed Consent. — Respect for persons requires that subjects, to the degree   that they are capable, be given the opportunity to choose what shall or shall not happen to them. This opportunity is provided when adequate standards for        informed consent are satisfied.

            While the importance of informed consent is unquestioned, controversy prevails    over the nature and possibility of an informed consent. Nonetheless, there is            widespread agreement that the consent process can be analyzed as containing    three elements: information, comprehension and voluntariness.

            2. Assessment of Risks and Benefits.

            The Nature and Scope of Risks and Benefits. The requirement that research be      justified on the basis of a favorable risk/benefit assessment bears a close relation          to the principle of beneficence, just as the moral requirement that informed      consent be obtained is derived primarily from the principle of respect for persons.       The term “risk” refers to a possibility that harm may occur. However, when            expressions such as “small risk” or “high risk” are used, they usually refer (often      ambiguously) both to the chance (probability) of experiencing a harm and the             severity (magnitude) of the envisioned harm.

NUREMBURG CODE OF ETHICS

            https://history.nih.gov/download/attachments/1016866/nuremberg.pdf?version=1&modifi            cationDate=1589152811742&api=v2

TRI-COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT: ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMANS (CANADA)

https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique_tcps2-eptc2_2018.html

A. General Principles

Consent Shall Be Given Voluntarily

Article 3.1

a. Consent shall be given voluntarily.

b. Consent can be withdrawn at any time.

c. If a participant withdraws consent, the participant can also request the

    withdrawal of their data or human biological materials.

Application

(a) The voluntariness of consent is important because it respects human dignity and means that individuals have chosen to participate in research according to their own values, preferences and wishes. The approach to recruitment is an important element in assuring voluntariness. In particular, how, when and where participants are approached and who recruits them are important elements in assuring (or undermining) voluntariness. In considering the voluntariness of consent, REBs and researchers should be cognizant of situations where undue influence, coercion or the offer of incentives may undermine

the voluntariness of a participant’s consent to participate in research. Undue influence

Undue influence and manipulation may arise when prospective participants are recruited by individuals in a position of authority. The influence of power relationships (e.g., employers and employees, teachers and students, commanding officers and members of the military or correctional officers and prisoners) on the voluntariness of consent should be judged from the perspective of prospective participants, since the individuals being recruited may feel constrained to follow the wishes of those who have some form of control over them. This control may be physical, psychological, financial or professional, for example, and may involve offering some form of inducement or threatening some

form of deprivation. In such situations, the control exerted in a power relationship may place undue pressure on the prospective participants. At the extreme, there can be no voluntariness if consent is secured by the order of authorities.

REBs and researchers should also pay particular attention to elements of trust and dependency in relationships (e.g., between physician and patient or between professor and student). These relationships can impose undue influence on the individual in the position of dependence to participate in research projects. Any relationship of dependency, even a nurturing one, may give rise to undue influence even if it is not applied overtly. There may be a greater risk of undue influence in situations of ongoing or significant dependency.

UNIVERSAL DECLARATION ON BIOETHICS AND HUMAN RIGHTS, 2005.

http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

Article 6 – Consent

1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.

2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice. Exceptions to this principle should be made only in accordance with ethical and legal standards adopted by States, consistent with the principles and provisions set out in this Declaration, in particular in Article 27, and international human rights law.

3. In appropriate cases of research carried out on a group of persons or a community, additional agreement of the legal representatives of the group or community concerned may be sought. In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.

WORLD MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

  • Declaration of Geneva, 1948

https://www.wma.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Decl-of-Geneva-v1948.pdf

  • Declaration of Helsinki, 1964

https://research.wayne.edu/irb/pdf/2-3-declaration-of-helsinki.pdf

  • Declaration of Helsinki, 2018

https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/

  • Declaration of Tokyo, 1975

https://pdf-it.dev.acw.website/please-and-thank-you?url=https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-tokyo-guidelines-for-physicians-concerning-torture-and-other-cruel-inhuman-or-degrading-treatment-or-punishment-in-relation-to-detention-and-imprisonment/&pdfName=wma-declaration-of-tokyo-guidelines-for-physicians-concerning-torture-and-other-cruel-inhuman-or-degrading-treatment-or-punishment-in-relation-to-detention-and-imprisonment

  • CANADIAN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW RELEVANT TO ASSSAULT, MEDICAL ETHICS, MEDICAL RESEARCH AND CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE

CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/C-46.pdf

  • Civil remedy not suspended

11 No civil remedy for an act or omission is suspended or affected by reason that the act or omission is a criminal offence.

  • Ignorance of the law

19 Ignorance of the law by a person who commits an offence is not an excuse for committing that offence.

  • Breach of trust by public officer
  • 122 Every official who, in connection with the duties of their office, commits fraud or a breach of trust, whether or not the fraud or breach of trust would be an offence if it were committed in relation to a private person, is guilty of
  • an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

  • Uttering threats
  • 264.1 (1) Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat.

→ “Trudeau warns of ‘consequences’ for public servants who duck COVID-19 shots”

            https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-consequences-public-servants-vaccines-                         1.6143735

  • Fraud
  • 380 (1) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service,

            (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of imprisonment not

                 exceeding fourteen years, where the subject-matter of the offence is a     

                 testamentary instrument or the value of the subject-matter of the offence  

                 exceeds five thousand dollars; or

            (b) is guilty

                 (i) of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not

                      exceeding two years, or

                 (ii) of an offence punishable on summary conviction, where the value of the

                       subject-matter of the offence does not exceed five thousand dollars.

            Minimum punishment

  • When a person is prosecuted on indictment and convicted of one or more offences   referred to in subsection

                        (1), the court that imposes the sentence shall impose a minimum punishment of    

                               imprisonment for a term of two years if the total value of the subject-matter

                               of the offences exceeds one million dollars.

  • Affecting public market

                        (2) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not

                              it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, with intent to defraud,                                     affects the public market price of stocks, shares, merchandise or anything that

                              is offered for sale to the public is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to

                              imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

  • Duty of persons to provide necessaries
  • 215 (1) Every one is under a legal duty

      (a) as a parent, foster parent, guardian or head of a family, to provide necessaries

            of life for a child under the age of sixteen years;

                        (b) to provide necessaries of life to their spouse or common-law partner; and

                        (c) to provide necessaries of life to a person under his charge if that person

                             (i) is unable, by reason of detention, age, illness, mental disorder or other

                                  cause, to withdraw himself from that charge, and

                             (ii) is unable to provide himself with necessaries of life.

Offence Infraction

            (2) Every person commits an offence who, being under a legal duty within the meaning

                  of subsection (1), fails without lawful excuse to perform that duty, if

            (a) with respect to a duty imposed by paragraph (1)(a) or (b),

                 (i) the person to whom the duty is owed is in destitute or necessitous circumstances, or

                 (ii) the failure to perform the duty endangers the life of the person to whom the duty is

                       owed, or causes or is likely to cause the health of that person to be endangered

                       permanently; or

            (b) with respect to a duty imposed by paragraph (1)

            (c), the failure to perform the duty endangers the life of the person to whom the duty is

                   owed or causes or is likely to cause the health of that person to be injured

                   permanently.

Punishment

            (3) Every one who commits an offence under subsection (2)

            (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding

                 five years; or

            (b) is guilty

Duty of persons undertaking acts dangerous to life

  • 216 Every one who undertakes to administer surgical or medical treatment to another person or to do any other lawful act that may endanger the life of another person is, except in cases of necessity, under a legal duty to have and to use reasonable knowledge, skill and care in so doing.

Duty of persons undertaking acts

  • 217 Every one who undertakes to do an act is under a legal duty to do it if an omission to do the act is or may be dangerous to life.

Duty of persons directing work

217.1 Every one who undertakes, or has the authority, to direct how another person does work or performs a task is under a legal duty to take reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm to that person, or any other person, arising from that work or task.

Criminal negligence

219 (1) Every one is criminally negligent who

            (a) in doing anything, or

            (b) in omitting to do anything that it is his duty to do, shows wanton or reckless disregard

                 for the lives or safety of other persons.

Causing bodily harm by criminal negligence

221 Every person who by criminal negligence causes bodily harm to another person is guilty of

  • an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years;

or

            (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Homicide

222 (1) A person commits homicide when, directly or indirectly, by any means, he causes the death of a human being.

            Kinds of homicide

            (2) Homicide is culpable or not culpable.

            (3) Homicide that is not culpable is not an offence.

            Culpable homicide

            (4) Culpable homicide is murder or manslaughter or infanticide.

            Idem

            (5) A person commits culpable homicide when he causes the death of a human being,

            (a) by means of an unlawful act;

            (b) by criminal negligence;

            (c) by causing that human being, by threats or fear of violence or by deception, to do

                 anything that causes his death; or

            (d) by wilfully frightening that human being, in the case of a child or sick person.

            Exception

            (6) Notwithstanding anything in this section, a person does not commit homicide within

                 the meaning of this Act by reason only that he causes the death of a human being by

                 procuring, by false evidence, the conviction and death of that human being by

                 sentence of the law.

When child becomes human being

  • 223 (1) A child becomes a human being within the meaning of this Act when it has completely proceeded, in a living state, from the body of its mother, whether or not

                        (a) it has breathed;

                        (b) it has an independent circulation; or

                        (c) the navel string is severed.

            Killing child

            (2) A person commits homicide when he causes injury to a child before or during its birth

                 as a result of which the child dies after becoming a human being.

Death that might have been prevented

  • 224 Where a person, by an act or omission, does any thing that results in the death of a human being, he causes the death of that human being notwithstanding that death from that cause might have been prevented by resorting to proper means.

Death from treatment of injury

  • 225 Where a person causes to a human being a bodily injury that is of itself of a dangerous nature and from which death results, he causes the death of that human being notwithstanding that the immediate cause of death is proper or improper treatment that is applied in good faith.

Acceleration of death

  • 226 Where a person causes to a human being a bodily injury that results in death, he causes the death of that human being notwithstanding that the effect of the bodily injury is only to accelerate his death from a disease or disorder arising from some other cause.

Exemption for medical assistance in dying

  • 227 (1) No medical practitioner or nurse practitioner commits culpable homicide if they provide a person with medical assistance in dying in accordance with section 241.2.

Killing by influence on the mind Homicide

  • 228 No person commits culpable homicide where he causes the death of a human being

                        (a) by any influence on the mind alone, or

                        (b) by any disorder or disease resulting from influence on the mind alone, but this

                              section does not apply where a person causes the death of a child or sick

                              person by wilfully frightening him.

Murder

  • 229 Culpable homicide is murder

            (a) where the person who causes the death of a human being

                 (i) means to cause his death, or

                             (ii) means to cause him bodily harm that he knows is likely to cause his death,

                                   and is reckless whether death ensues or not;

(b) where a person, meaning to cause death to a human being or meaning to cause

                              Him bodily harm that he knows is likely to cause his death, and being reckless

                              whether death ensues or not, by accident or mistake causes death to another

                              human being, notwithstanding that he does not mean to cause death or bodily

                              harm to that human being; or

                        (c) if a person, for an unlawful object, does anything that they know is likely to

                             cause death, and by doing so causes the death of a human being, even if they

                          desire to effect their object without causing death or bodily harm to any human

                          being.

Classification of murder

  • 231 (1) Murder is first degree murder or second degree murder.

            Planned and deliberate murder

(2) Murder is first degree murder when it is planned and deliberate.

Contracted murder

(3) Without limiting the generality of subsection (2), murder is planned and deliberate

      when it is committed pursuant to an arrangement under which money or anything

      of value passes or is intended to pass from one person to another, or is promised by

      one person to another, as consideration for that other’s causing or assisting in causing

      the death of anyone or counselling another person to do any act causing or assisting in

      causing that death.

Conspiracy

  • 465 (1) Except where otherwise expressly provided by law, the following provisions apply in respect of conspiracy:

(a) every one who conspires with any one to commit murder or to cause another person to

      be murdered, whether in Canada or not, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to

      a maximum term of imprisonment for life;

(b) every one who conspires with any one to prosecute a person for an alleged offence,

      knowing that they did not commit that offence, is guilty of

      (i) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10  

          Years or an offence punishable on summary conviction, if the alleged offence is

           one for which, on conviction, that person would be liable to be sentenced to

           imprisonment for life or for a term of not more than 14 years, or

      (ii) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five

            years or an offence punishable on summary conviction, if the alleged offence is

            one for which, on conviction, that person would be liable to imprisonment for less

            than 14 years;

(c) every one who conspires with any one to commit an indictable offence not provided

     for in paragraph (a) or (b) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to the same

     punishment as that to which an accused who is guilty of that offence would, on

     conviction, be liable; and

(d) every one who conspires with any one to commit an offence punishable on summary

      conviction is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

(2) [Repealed, 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 61] (2) [Abrogé, L.R. (1985), ch. 27 (1er suppl.), art. 61]

Conspiracy to commit offences

(3) Every one who, while in Canada, conspires with any one to do anything referred to in

      subsection (1) in a place outside Canada that is an offence under the laws of that

      place shall be deemed to have conspired to do that thing in Canada.

Idem

(4) Every one who, while in a place outside Canada, conspires with any one to do

      anything referred to in subsection (1) in Canada shall be deemed to have conspired

      in Canada to do that thing.

Jurisdiction

(5) Where a person is alleged to have conspired to do anything that is an offence by

      virtue of subsection (3) or (4), proceedings in respect of that offence may, whether

      or not that person is in Canada, be commenced in any territorial division in Canada,

      and the accused may be tried and punished in respect of that offence in the same

      manner as if the offence had been committed in that territorial division.

Conspiracy in restraint of trade

  • 466 (1) A conspiracy in restraint of trade is an agreement between two or more persons to do or to procure to be done any unlawful act in restraint of trade.

Definition of trade combination

Definitions

  • 467.1 (1) The following definitions apply in this Act.

            Criminal organization means a group, however organized, that

(a) is composed of three or more persons in or outside Canada; and

(b) has as one of its main purposes or main activities the facilitation or commission of

     one or more serious offences that, if committed, would likely result in the direct or

     indirect receipt of a material benefit, including a financial benefit, by the group or by

     any of the persons who constitute the group. It does not include a group of persons

     that forms randomly for the immediate commission of a single offence.

Serious offence

means an indictable offence under this or any other Act of Parliament for which the maximum punishment is imprisonment for five years or more, or another offence that is prescribed by regulation.

Facilitation

(2) For the purposes of this section, section 467.11 and 467.111, facilitation of an offence

     does not require knowledge of a particular offence the commission of which is

     facilitated, or that an offence actually be committed.

Commission of offence

(3) In this section and in sections 467.11 to 467.13, committing an offence means being a party to it or counselling any person to be a party to it.

Regulations

(4) The Governor in Council may make regulations prescribing offences that are included in the definition serious offence in subsection (1).

Participation in activities of criminal organization

  • 467.11 (1) Every person who, for the purpose of enhancing the ability of a criminal organization to facilitate or commit an indictable offence under this or any other Act of Parliament, knowingly, by act or omission, participates in or contributes to any activity of the criminal organization is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five

     years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND WAR CRIMES ACT

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-45.9/page-1.html

CANADIAN INSTITUTES OF HEALTH RESEARCH ACT

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-18.1/FullText.html

            Parliament recognizes that the provinces are responsible for the delivery of health care to

            Canadians and that the Government of Canada collaborates with provincial governments to support the health care system and health research  International Covenant on Civil and     Political Rights

COMMAND RESPONSIBILITY AND SUPERIOR ORDERS IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY – A CENTURY OF EVOLUTION

https://www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/issues/v10n1/hendin101nf.html

            Canada

            Canadian judges, in one forum or another, have, since 1990, considered the doctrines of   command responsibility, and superior orders on at least three locations. One of these was      a determination in the            Supreme Court of Canada. [265] the second a decision by the          Canadian Court Martial Appeal Court[266] and the third, a Commission of Inquiry   subsequent to the 1992 deployment of Canadian Forces into Somalia. [267]

            This Court, however, at the same time, took a somewhat unusual position by noting that   where the situation is so outrageous that it would not be reasonable to permit the defence      of superior orders to be used at all. In this regard the Supreme Court of Canada accepted     the rationale of the Israeli court and noted:

            That there is nothing unfair in not permitting superior orders as a defence   where the act is ‘manifestly unlawful’ is evident when one considers the          nature of the manifestly unlawful order as it appears in Ofer v Chief Military Prosecutor (the Kafr Qassem case [Appeal 279-283/58, Psakim Judgments of the District Courts of Israel), vol. 44 at p 362] cited in         appeal before the A Military Court of Appeal, Pal. Y. B. Int’l L. (1985)      vol. 2 p.69 at 108 where the Military Court of Appeal approved the       following judgment:

The identifying mark of a ‘manifestly unlawful’ order must waver like a black flag above the order given, as a way of saying, ‘ forbidden’. It is not unlawfulness, hidden or half-hidden, not unlawfulness that is detectable only by legal experts, that is important issue here, but an overt and salient violation of the law, a certain and obvious unlawfulness that stems from the order itself, the criminal character of the order itself or the act it demands to be committed, and unlawfulness that pierces the eye and agitates the heart, if the eye be not blind or the heart corrupt. That is the degree of ‘manifest’ illegality required in order to annul the soldier’s duty to obey and render him criminally responsible for his actions.[271]

INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS

https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CCPR.aspx

            Part III

            Article 6

            1. Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by           law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.

            Article 7

            No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or             punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to      medical or scientific experimentation.

            Article 9

            1. Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be subjected         to arbitrary arrest or detention. No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such            grounds and in accordance with such procedure as are established by law.

            Article 18

            1. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This        right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and   freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to           manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.

            2. No one shall be subject to coercion which would impair his freedom to have or to         adopt a religion or belief of his choice.

            3. Freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs may be subject only to such           limitations as             are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order,       health, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.

            Article 19

            1. Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.

            2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of             frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other   media of his choice.

            Article 26

            All persons are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to the      equal protection of the law. In this respect, the law shall prohibit any discrimination        and guarantee to all persons equal and effective protection against discrimination on      any ground such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion,            national or social origin, property, birth or other status.

CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE

https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.1_Convention%20on%20the%20Prevention%20and%20Punishment%20of%20the%20Crime%20of%20Genocide.pdf

Article II

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

            Article III

            The following acts shall be punishable:

            (a) Genocide;

            (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;

            (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;

            (d) Attempt to commit genocide;

            (e) Complicity in genocide.

            Article IV

            Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be      punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private        individuals.

INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS

https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/1976/03/19760323%2006-17%20AM/Ch_IV_04.pdf

            Article 7. No one shall bе subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment            or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical    or scientific experimentation.

ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/Documents/RS-Eng.pdf

PART 2.

JURISDICTION, ADMISSIBILITY AND APPLICABLE LAW

Article 5

Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court

The jurisdiction of the Court shall be limited to the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. The Court has jurisdiction in accordance with this Statute with respect to the following crimes:

(a) The crime of genocide;

(b) Crimes against humanity;

(c) War crimes;

(d) The crime of aggression.

Article 6

Genocide

For the purpose of this Statute, “genocide” means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about    

      its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article 7

Crimes against humanity

1. For the purpose of this Statute, “crime against humanity” means any of the

    following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack

    directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:

(a) Murder;

(b) Extermination;

(c) Enslavement;

(d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;

(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of

      fundamental rules of international law;

(f) Torture;

(g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced

      sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;

(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial,

      national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other

      grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international

      law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime

      within the jurisdiction of the Court;

(i) Enforced disappearance of persons;

(j) The crime of apartheid;

(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great   

      suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.

Article 8

War crimes

1. The Court shall have jurisdiction in respect of war crimes in particular when

     committed as part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of

     such crimes.

2. For the purpose of this Statute, “war crimes” means:

(a) Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of

      the following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions

      of the relevant Geneva Convention:

     (i) Wilful killing;

     (ii) Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments;

     (iii) Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health;

  • APPLICABLE CANADIAN LAW, PUBLIC POLICY, SUITS AND TRIBUNAL HEARINGS

CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982

https://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/index.html

            Fundamental freedoms

            2 Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

            (a) freedom of conscience and religion;

            (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press

                  and other media of communication;

            (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and

            (d) freedom of association.

Mobility of citizens

6. (1) Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada.

    (2) Every citizen of Canada and every person who has the status of a permanent

          resident of Canada has the right

  • to move to and take up residence in any province; and

    (b) to pursue the gaining of a livelihood in any province.

Limitation

(3) The rights specified in subsection (2) are subject to

(a) any laws or practices of general application in force in a province other than

      those that discriminate among persons primarily on the basis of province of

      present or previous residence; and

(b) any laws providing for reasonable residency requirements as a qualification

      for the receipt of publicly provided social services.

Life, liberty and security of person

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

Equality before and under law and equal protection and benefit of law

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Enforcement of guaranteed rights and freedoms

24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.

Exclusion of evidence bringing administration of justice into disrepute

CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND WAR CRIMES ACT

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-45.9/page-1.html

An Act respecting genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes and to implement the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, and to make consequential amendments to other Acts.

EMERGENCIES ACT

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/E-4.5.pdf

Preamble

WHEREAS the safety and security of the individual, the protection of the values of the body politic and the preservation of the sovereignty, security and territorial integrity of the state are fundamental obligations of government;

AND WHEREAS the fulfilment of those obligations in Canada may be seriously threatened by a national emergency and, in order to ensure safety and security during such an emergency, the Governor in Council should be authorized, subject to the supervision of Parliament, to take special temporary measures that may not be appropriate in normal times;

AND WHEREAS the Governor in Council, in taking such special temporary measures, would be subject to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Canadian Bill of Rights and must have regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, particularly with respect to those fundamental rights that are not to be limited or abridged even in a national emergency;

Definitions

5 In this Part,

declaration of a public welfare emergency means a proclamation issued pursuant to subsection 6(1);

National emergency

3 For the purposes of this Act, a national emergency is an urgent and critical situation of a temporary nature that

(a) seriously endangers the lives, health or safety of Canadians and is of such proportions or nature as to exceed the capacity or authority of a province to deal with it, or (b) seriously threatens the ability of the Government of Canada to preserve the sovereignty, security and

territorial integrity of Canada and that cannot be effectively dealt with under any other

law of Canada.

public welfare emergency means an emergency that is caused by a real or imminent

(a) fire, flood, drought, storm, earthquake or other natural phenomenon,

(b) disease in human beings, animals or plants, or

(c) accident or pollution and that results or may result in a danger to life or property, social disruption or a breakdown in the flow of essential goods, services or resources, so serious as to be a national emergency.

Declaration of a public order emergency Proclamation

17 (1) When the Governor in Council believes, on reasonable grounds, that a public order emergency exists and necessitates the taking of special temporary measures for dealing with the emergency, the Governor in Council, after such consultation as is required by section 25, may, by proclamation, so declare.

Effective date

18 (1) A declaration of a public order emergency is effective on the day on which it is issued, but a motion for confirmation of the declaration shall be laid before each House of Parliament and be considered in accordance with section 58.

 (2) A declaration of a public order emergency expires at the end of thirty days unless the declaration is previously revoked or continued in accordance with this Act.

GENETIC NON-DISCRIMINATION ACT

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/G-2.5/page-1.htm

Interpretation

Definitions

2 The following definitions apply in this Act.

genetic test means a test that analyzes DNA, RNA or chromosomes for purposes such as the prediction of disease or vertical transmission risks, or monitoring, diagnosis or prognosis.

Prohibitions

Genetic test

3 (1) It is prohibited for any person to require an individual to undergo a genetic test as a condition of

(a) providing goods or services to that individual;

(b) entering into or continuing a contract or agreement with that individual; or

(c) offering or continuing specific terms or conditions in a contract or agreement with that individual.

Refusal to undergo genetic test

(2) It is prohibited for any person to refuse to engage in an activity described in any of paragraphs (1)(a) to (c) in respect of an individual on the grounds that the individual

has refused to undergo a genetic test.

Disclosure of results

4 (1) It is prohibited for any person to require an individual to disclose the results of a genetic test as a condition of engaging in an activity described in any of paragraphs 3(1)(a) to (c).

Refusal to disclose results

(2) It is prohibited for any person to refuse to engage in an activity described in any of paragraphs 3(1)(a) to (c) in respect of an individual on the grounds that the individual

has refused to disclose the results of a genetic test.

Written consent

5 It is prohibited for any person who is engaged in an activity described in any of paragraphs 3(1)(a) to (c) in respect of an individual to collect, use or disclose the results of a genetic test of the individual without the individual’s written consent.

Exceptions: health care practitioners and researchers

6 Sections 3 to 5 do not apply to

(a) a physician, a pharmacist or any other health care practitioner in respect of an individual to whom they are providing health services; or

(b) a person who is conducting medical, pharmaceutical or scientific research in respect of an individual who is a participant in the research.

HEALTH CANADA 1997 COMMUNICABLE DISEASE REPORT SUPPLEMENT CANADIAN NATIONAL REPORT ON IMMUNIZATION, 1996:

http://www.gov.mb.ca/health/publichealth/cdc/div/about.html#q

  • Unlike some other countries immunization is not mandatory in Canada; it cannot be made mandatory because of the Canadian Constitution.
  • It must be emphasized that…exceptions are permitted on medical or religious grounds and reasons of conscience; legislation and regulations must not be interpreted to imply compulsory immunization”.

MANITOBA HEALTH – FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT VACCINES

PROVINCE OF ONTARIO

  • Face coverings and face masks

https://www.ontario.ca/page/face-coverings-and-face-masks

  • “Face coverings will not stop you from getting  COVID-19, but may help protect others”

→ Note: Ontario government provides no valid research evidence for this claim.

  • When you don’t have to wear a face covering

There are some situations when you do not need to wear a face covering.

You do not need medical documentation to support any of the exceptions below.

Children

Children do not have to wear a face covering indoors if they are younger than two years old.

Health and accommodations

You do not need to wear a face covering if you:

have a medical condition that inhibits your ability to wear a face covering are unable to put on or remove your face covering without help from someone else are receiving accommodations according to the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005 or the Human Rights Code

Workplaces

You do not need to wear a face covering when you are working in an area that allows you to maintain a distance of at least 2 metres from anyone else while you are indoors.

  • Immunization of School Pupils Act, R.S.O. 1990

→ Note: see changes over the years, especially the recent version of the law which

                excludes natural immunity

(April 19, 2021 to the e-Laws currency date)

(May 30, 2017 to August 31, 2017)

(December 31, 2011 to May 29, 2017)

(June 3, 2010 to December 30, 2011)

(June 3, 2010 to December 30, 2011)

(December 15, 2009 to May 17, 2010)

(October 1, 2007 to December 14, 2009)

(June 4, 2007 to September 30, 2007)

(June 4, 2007 to September 30, 2007)

Health Care Consent Act, 1996, S.O. 1996, c. 2, Sched. A

https://www.ontario.ca/laws/docs/96h02_e.doc

Consent to Treatment

No treatment without consent

10 (1)  A health practitioner who proposes a treatment for a person shall not administer

            the treatment, and shall take reasonable steps to ensure that it is not administered,

            unless,

  • he or she is of the opinion that the person is capable with respect to the

                              treatment, and the person has given consent; or

  • he or she is of the opinion that the person is incapable with respect to the 

                              treatment, and the person’s substitute decision-maker has given consent on the

                              person’s behalf in accordance with this Act.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 10 (1).

Opinion of Board or court governs

(2)  If the health practitioner is of the opinion that the person is incapable with respect to 

       the treatment, but the person is found to be capable with respect to the treatment by

       the Board on an application for review of the health practitioner’s finding, or by a

       court on an appeal of the Board’s decision, the health practitioner shall not

       administer the treatment, and shall take reasonable steps to ensure that it is not

      administered, unless the person has given consent.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 10 (2).

Elements of consent

11 (1)  The following are the elements required for consent to treatment:

            1. The consent must relate to the treatment.

            2. The consent must be informed.

            3. The consent must be given voluntarily.

            4. The consent must not be obtained through misrepresentation or fraud. 1996,

                 c. 2, Sched. A, s. 11 (1).

Informed consent

(2)  A consent to treatment is informed if, before giving it,

(a) the person received the information about the matters set out in subsection (3) that a

     reasonable person in the same circumstances would require in order to make a

     decision about the treatment; and

(b) the person received responses to his or her requests for additional information about

     those matters.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 11 (2).

Same

(3)  The matters referred to in subsection (2) are:

            1. The nature of the treatment.

            2. The expected benefits of the treatment.

            3. The material risks of the treatment.

            4. The material side effects of the treatment.

            5. Alternative courses of action.

            6. The likely consequences of not having the treatment.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A,

                 s. 11 (3).

Express or implied

(4)  Consent to treatment may be express or implied.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 11 (4).

Included consent

12 Unless it is not reasonable to do so in the circumstances, a health practitioner is

     entitled to presume that consent to a treatment includes,

(a) consent to variations or adjustments in the treatment, if the nature, expected benefits,

     material risks and material side effects of the changed treatment are not significantly

     different from the nature, expected benefits, material risks and material side effects of

     the original treatment; and

(b) consent to the continuation of the same treatment in a different setting, if there is no

      significant change in the expected benefits, material risks or material side effects of

      the treatment as a result of the change in the setting in which it is administered. 1996,

      c. 2, Sched. A, s. 12.

            Emergency Treatment

            No treatment contrary to wishes

            26.A health practitioner shall not administer a treatment under section 25 if the health

                  practitioner has reasonable grounds to believe that the person, while capable and after

                  attaining 16 years of age, expressed a wish applicable to the circumstances to refuse

                  consent to the treatment.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 26.

  • School Vaccination Information for Parents, Legal Guardians and School Administration (Ontario)

→ Note: Children 12 years and older do not need parental consent to undergo an

               experimental procedure

https://www.niagararegion.ca/health/vaccinations/children/required-vaccinations.aspx

https://twitter.com/regionofpeel/status/1395364782694404097

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AND CIVIL PROTECTION ACT

https://www.ontario.ca/laws/about-e-laws#ccl

Declaration of emergency

4 (1)  The head of council of a municipality may declare that an emergency exists in the municipality or in any part thereof and may take such action and make such orders as he or she considers necessary and are not contrary to law to implement the emergency plan of the municipality and to protect property and the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the emergency area.  R.S.O. 1990, c. E.9, s. 4 (1).

  • MEDICL TYRRANY AND THE CANADIAN MISRULERSHIP CLASS’S COMPLICITY WITH CORPORATE AND FOREIGN POWERS

            Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada

  • World Economic Forum_Klaus schwab, trudeau and other young leaders

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-B1Mc0PbXjw

  • Davos 2016 – The Canadian Opportunity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByIejZDQNmc

  • Justin Trudeau is sworn-in as Canada’s 23rd Prime Minister on November 4, 2015-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jT1l5kesjKA
  • Trudeau’s foundation owns 40% of Acuitas Therapeutics which makes mechanic lipids for Pfizer

https://www.onenewspage.com/video/20220223/14393192/Trudeau-foundation-owns-40-of-Acuitas-Therapeutics.htm

  • The country Trudeau admires most? China

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVusYrv2jIU

  • Chair of Trudeau-funded ‘anti-hate’ network spreads antisemitism hoax to smear Canadian truckers

https://thepostmillennial.com/chair-of-trudeau-funded-anti-hate-network-spreads-antisemitic-hoax-to-smear-canadian-truckers

https://www.bitchute.com/video/wTThllqdyGZo/

  • Indian politician calls out Trudeau’s hypocrisy on civil rights
    https://tnc.news/2022/02/15/indian-politician-calls-out-trudeaus-hypocrisy-on-civil-rights/
  • “Over the past many months and years now, Canadians have stepped up to protect each other; to protect our frontline workers; to protect our elders; to protect our young people; to protect people like truckers who are putting food on our grocery store shelves. Canadians have stepped up to the right thing to protect the freedoms and the rights of Canadians to get back to the things we love to do. We know the way through this pandemic is by getting everyone vaccinated. And the overwhelming majority, close to 90 percent of Canadians have done exactly that. The small fringe minority of people on their way to Ottawa or who are holding unacceptable views that they are expressing, do not represent the views of Canadians who have been for each other, who know following the science and stepping up to protect each other is the best way to ensure our freedoms, our rights, our values as a country. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGehU1zszQs
  • Yes, we will emerge from this pandemic through vaccination. We know people who are still making up their minds, and we will try to convince them, but there are also people who are vehemently opposed to vaccination. These are extremists, who do not believe in science, who are often misogynists, often racists, too; it is a sect, a small group, but who are taking up space, and here we have to make a choice, as a leader, as a countryDo we tolerate these people? Or, do we say let see…because most people…Eighty percent of Quebecers did the right thing, that is, they got vaccinated; we want to get back to the things we like doing and these people are not going to block us now. Jan 8, 2022

https://peoplesworldwar.com/urgent-stop-trudeaus-hate-crimes/

  • Justin Trudeau Speaks with Reporters in Welland, Ont. – September 6, 2021

“Yes, there is a small, fringe element in this country that is angry, that doesn’t believe in science, that is lashing out with racist, misogynistic attacks, but Canadians, the vast majority of Canadians, are not represented by them. And I know will not allow those voices , hose special interests groups, those protesters who can…I don’t even want to call them protestors, those anti-vaxxer mobs, to dictate how this country gets throught this panic and how this country gets through this pandemic and how we re…[unclear]…from these lockdowns where people can get back to work and back to doing the things they want to do and keep our kids safe. They don’t dictate of this policy of this government (42:20 – 43:25)

https://www.cpac.ca/episode?id=a198cfec-573a-4b56-a776-47a91a28aa9a

  • The Powers of the Canadian Prime Minister

https://www.constitutionalstudies.ca/2017/01/the-powers-of-the-canadian-prime-minister/

  • Who Is the Head of State in Canada?

https://www.thoughtco.com/head-of-state-510594

  • Justin Trudeau’s idea of ‘diversity’

https://thumbnails.cbc.ca/maven_legacy/thumbnails/841/786/photo-blackface-details-trudeau-fletcher-190919.jpg

https://cdn.newspunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/trudeaublackface23097.jpg.optimal.jpg

            Chrystia Freeland

  • World Economic Forum

https://www.weforum.org/people/chrystia-freeland

  • Chrystia Freeland’s side gig with the WEF is endangering Canadian democracy

https://notcbc.ca/2021/02/03/chrystia-freelands-side-gig-with-the-wef-is-endangering-canadian-democracy/

  • “Follow the money,” Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland says

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ti7LryfAiF4

Jagmeet Singh

Other Canadians of the World Economic Forum

  • Canadian Members of the World Economic Forum

https://www.beyondthenarrative.ca/canadian-federal-politician-members-of-the-world-economic-forum/

  • Exposing Canadians of Influence Tied to The Great Reset Agenda

https://peoplesworldwar.com/exposing-canadians-of-influence-tied-to-great-reset-agenda/

https://peoplesworldwar.com/treason-acting-to-aid-a-countrys-enemies/

  • CANADIAN ETHICISTS, CRITICAL CLINICIANS, SCIENTISTS, POLITICIANS AND VACCINOLOGISTS

Paul Alexander, MD

https://www.drpaulalexander.com/

  • Dr. Paul Alexander (Six Covid Lies)

https://odysee.com/@tommyspodcast:8/TPC561_SD_video:c

  • Convoy Doctors Roger Hodkinson & Paul Alexander Press Conference

https://odysee.com/@LauraLynnTT:9/Live_Doctors—08-February-2022_EDIT:6

  • Save our Children! Dr. Paul Alexander

https://odysee.com/@TheMadWatcherTV:b/Save-our-Children-Dr.-Paul-Alexander:e

  • Dr. Paul Alexander, Dr. Roger Hodkinson, other Doctors + Truckers, Ottawa

https://odysee.com/@AussieFighter:8/%F0%9F%87%A8%F0%9F%87%A6-Dr.-Paul-Alexander,-Dr.-Roger-Hodkinson,-Other-Doctors:b

Byram Bridle, PhD

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZwlWr6LOWMph/

            9:19 – 23:00

Roger Hodkinson, MD

  • Dr. Roger Hodkinson on COVID19: “It’s all been a pack of lies”, Published on August 20, 2021

            https://principia-scientific.com/dr-roger-hodkinson-on-covid19-its-all-been-a-pack-of-       lies/

  • Dr. Reiner Fuellmich interview with Dr. Roger Hodkinson

https://www.bitchute.com/video/rLfUoUj0pssg/

Dr. Hoffe, Dr. Malthouse: Death Vax For Kids, Covid 1984, Posted on December 18, 2021

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Eu07HeAhSMVK/

Patrick Phillips, MD

  • Dr. Patrick Phillips Unweaves the Medical psy-op, January 5th, 2022

https://odysee.com/@Infoweapons:1/Dr.Patrick-Phillips-Unweaves-the-Medical-psy-op:2

  • Press Conference – Dr. Patrick Phillips’ Story

https://odysee.com/@WholeHeartedMedia:a/Dr-Patrick-Phillips-censorship-and-slander:9

  • Dr. Patrick Phillips – The War Against Medical Tyranny | Brightlightnews.com,October 4th, 2021

https://odysee.com/@Justice_League_Odysee:d/DrPatrickPhillipsBright:4

  • Doctor Talks 19: 1 on 1 with Dr Patrick Phillips, October 12th, 2021,

International Clinicians, scientists and vaccinologists

https://odysee.com/@WhatsUpCanada:2/Doctor-talks-19-1-on-1-with-Dr-Patrick-Phillips:7

  • The Canadian Parliamentary Network by MP Derek Sloan

23:00 – 28:25

Brian Peckford

  • A Personal Declaration of Opposition to the Abuse of Our Charter of Rights and Freedoms by the State

Jordan Peterson

https://www.jordanbpeterson.com/#

Julie Ponesse

https://odysee.com/$/search?q=Brett%20Weinstein%20and%20Julie%20ponesse

  • CASES, SUITS, TRIBUNAL DECISIONS AND LAWYERS: CANADA

Law and COVID-19 Resistance in Canada: legal strategies you can use to prevent what is legally assault and battery

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CVgw1c_vYos/?utm_medium=copy_link

  • This is essential for all workers. It does not constitute legal advice, but suggests strategies for legally enforcing employer responsibility and invoking the Criminal Code of Canada.

COVID 19 – Mandatory Vaccine Policies Legally Challenged through Grievance Arbitrations, November 25, 2021

https://coxandpalmerlaw.com/publication/covid-19-mandatory-vaccine-policies-legally-challenged-through-grievance-arbitrations/.

The Canadian Peoples Union NFP

https://1d795428-6692-4888-b0fd-249d556879b5.filesusr.com/ugd/2aab7d_7af992c60f2d41fc8108a273a00a0093.pdf

Michael Swinwood

  • Attorney Michael Swinwood With Reiner Fuellmich: “The Consciousness of Humanity Is Really What’s at Play Here”, April 26th, 2021

https://odysee.com/@Truth_Comes_to_Light:6/Michael-Swinwood-with-Reiner-Fuellmich-0:c

  • Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Michael Swinwood with Major Russ Cooper – 17 Aug 2021

https://odysee.com/@BackToTheLight:7/Major-Russ-Cooper-in-hot-with-Reiner-Fuellmich-and-Michael-Swinwood–17-Aug-2021:7

The Canadian Peoples Union NFP

https://50bfc63a-1b14-4595-8da1-c38639c33338.filesusr.com/ugd/7a8151_b270e395ba2e44828c6c1587ab1a7702.pdf

Ontario Court Issues Interim Injunction Against UHN Vaccine Mandate

https://peoplesworldwar.com/ontario-court-issues-interim-injunction-against-uhn-vaccine-mandate/

The Free North Declaration

https://www.freenorthdeclaration.ca/

  1. CANADIAN BODILY SOVEREIGNTY AND

    MEDICAL ETHICS INITIATIVES

Action 4 Canada

https://action4canada.com/

  • “Vaccine” Notice of Liability: Post-Secondary Educational Institutions

https://action4canada.com/wp-content/uploads/vaccine-notice-of-liability-post-grad-students-july-27-21.PDF

Canadian Covid Care Alliance

https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/

  • More Harm Than Good – Canadian Covid Care Alliance, January 4th, 2022

https://odysee.com/@esousaonline:7/CCCA-More-Harm-Than-Good:6

  • PDF – More Harm Than Good – Canadian Covid Care Alliance, January 4th, 2022

https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/The-COVID-19-Inoculations-More-Harm-Than-Good-REV-Dec-16-2021.pdf

Freedom Convoy 2022

https://freedomconvoycanada.com/

  • Freedom Convoy Feb.17, 2022 Press Conference

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OX4F2F8dDMw

  • IA – What Happened in Ottawa? – Freedom Convoy 2022 Documentary

https://odysee.com/@lancewdetrick:b/IA—What-Happened-in-Ottawa—Freedom-Convoy-2022-Documentary:0

Justice Centre for Constitutional Rights

https://www.jccf.ca/

  • Surgeon fired by College of Medicine for voicing safety concerns about Covid shots for children | Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms

https://www.jccf.ca/surgeon-fired-by-college-of-medicine-for-voicing-safety-concerns-about-covid-shots-for-children/

Liberty Coalition Canada

https://www.libertycoalitioncanada.com/

  • Religious Freedom From Vaccination Coercion

https://www.libertycoalitioncanada.com/religious-freedom-from-vaccination-coercion

  • Open Letter to Employers Refusing Reasonable Accommodations

https://www.libertycoalitioncanada.com/copy-of-open-letter-to-employers

  • Open Letter to Canadian Universities and Colleges mandating COVID Vaccines

https://www.libertycoalitioncanada.com/open-letter-to-universities-and-colleges

Ontario Civil Liberties Association

https://ocla.ca/

  • A Letter to the Unvaccinated, Posted on August 2, 2021

https://ocla.ca/a-letter-to-the-unvaccinated/

https://canadianliberty.com/open-letter-to-the-unvaccinated-multilingual/

Open Letter Regarding University Vaccination and Testing Mandates, Wednesday, September 1, 2021

https://ocla.ca/professors-write-open-letter-regarding-university-vaccination-and-testing-mandates/

Open letter to UW officials: Repeal the COVID vaccination and testing mandates

https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~mannr/Open-letter-UW-vaccine-mandates.html

Stand Up Canada

https://standupcanada.solutions/

Students for COVID Ethics

https://studentsforcovidethics.org/

Vaccine Choice Canada – Public Information & Resource Group

https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/

  • Our Rights of Refusal with Rocco Galati, Tanya Gaw & Other Guests, September 01, 2021, 7 pm E

https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/media/rights-of-refusal/

  • Legal Exemption Forms

https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/exemptions/legal-exemption-forms/

  • Ontario Lawsuit News Release – Vaccine Choice Canada October 28, 2019

https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/exemptions/news-release-vaccine-choice-canada-october-28-2019

  1. CANADIAN CRITICAL THINKING COVID-19

    NEWS AND INFORMATION SITES

Canadian Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms:

https://www.jccf.ca/

Bright Light News

https://brightlightnews.com/

  • Stillbirths Exploding Across Canada in Fully Vaccinated Mothers – Dr. Daniel Nagase

https://brightlightnews.com/?s=Dr.+Daniel+Nagase

Canada Unity

https://canada-unity.com/mou/

Clyde Do Something

https://rumble.com/c/c-389885?date=this-week

Druthers News – Druthers News & Information

Inn24

https://inn24.ca/author/vaudette/

Matrix World Report

https://rumble.com/c/c-647887

People’s World War: Our Freedom at Risk

https://peoplesworldwar.com/

  • Crimes Against Humanity Being Investigated by Teams of Lawyers Worldwide

https://peoplesworldwar.com/crimes-against-humanity-investigated-by-lawyers-worldwide/

Rebel News

https://www.rebelnews.com/

Strong and Free Canada.org

https://strongandfreecanada.org/bearhug/

The Canadian Parliamentary Network by MP Derek Sloan, June 17, 2021

https://www.cpac.ca/episode?id=cd50ce93-5138-4489-a88f-bb8065b7aa32

www.bitchute.com/video/ZwlWr6LOWMph/

True North

https://tnc.news/about-true-north/

  1. INTERNATIONAL CLINICIANS, SCIENTISTS

    AND VACCINOLOGISTS

Tarik Alam, MD

Sucharit Bakhdi, PhD

  • Corona Unmasked: New facts and figures

https://www.goldegg-verlag.com/goldegg-verlag/wp-content/uploads/corona_unmasked_engl_leseprobe.pdf

  • Sucharit Bhakdi – Full Interview – Planet Lockdown, February 15th, 2021

https://odysee.com/@TruthVault:0/Sucharit-Bhakdi—Full-Interview—Planet-Lockdown-:b

Corona unmasked

http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/may2021/luisv516-1.htm

Tom Cowan, MD

  • Dr Tom Cowan cannot find proof of isolation of Covid-19

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Z7e1WLoOctZ2/

Geert Vanden Bossche

  • Open Letter to the WHO: Immediately Halt All Covid-19 Mass Vaccinations

https://fos-sa.org/?p=3260

            https://odysee.com/@GeertVandenBosscheVideos:9/Meeting-of-the-COVID-19-Giants-  with-Geert-Vanden-Bossche-and-Robert-Malone-MD:d

  • Geert Vanden Bossche & Bret Weinstein

https://odysee.com/@BretWeinstein:f/darkhorse-podcast-with-geert-vanden:b

  • Episode 242 – The Vanden Bossche Interview

            November 19th, 2021

            https://odysee.com/@The-Highwire-with-Del-Bigtree:a/Episode-242—The-Vanden-         Bossche-Interview:7

Shankara Chetty, MD

https://drshankarachetty.com/

  • Dr. Shankara Chetty | Session 82: There´s No Such Thing As A Free Lunch

            December 11th, 2021

            https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Dr-Shankara-Chetty-session-82-             en:5 see 1:25:20 – 1:38:35

  • DEPOPULATION – Covid19 – Vaccine Data Analysis by Dr. Shankara Chetty November 24th, 2021

            https://odysee.com/@HumanitysVault:a/DEPOPULATION—Covid19—Vaccine-Data-   Analysis-By-Dr.-Shankara-Chetty:f

Peter Doshi, PhD

  • Why we petitioned the FDA to refrain from fully approving any covid-19 vaccine this year, June 8, 2021

https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/06/08/why-we-petitioned-the-fda-to-refrain-from-fully-approving-any-covid-19-vaccine-this-year/

Barbara Fisher, MD

https://www.nvic.org/

Dr. Richard Fleming, MD., PhD

https://www.flemingmethod.com/copy-of-fleming-method;https://www.flemingmethod.com/

  • Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon? A Scientific and Forensic investigation

https://www.skyhorsepublishing.com/9781510770195/is-covid-19-a-bioweapon/

Pierre Kory, MD

https://covid19criticalcare.com/team/pierre-kory-m-d-m-p-a/

Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCCA)

https://covid19criticalcare.com/

Great Barringon Declaration

Dietrich Klinghardt, MD, PhD

  • Klinghardt Debrief: Biological Approach to Chronic Lyme Disease, September 2nd, 2021

https://odysee.com/@KlinghardtInstitute:6/klinghardt-debrief-biological-approach:3

  • Klinghardt Debrief: Biological Approach to Chronic Lyme Disease – Part 2, September 10th, 2021

https://odysee.com/@KlinghardtInstitute:6/klinghardt-debrief-biological-approach-2:a

Martin Kulldorff MD., Sunetra Gupta MD., and Jay Bhattacharya MD.

The Great Barrington Declaration

https://gbdeclaration.org

Robert Malone, MD, MS

            https://open.spotify.com/episode/3SCsueX2bZdbEzRtKOCEyT?si=RKhah8fARW-         0LR1ciN-tHA&utm_source=copy-link&nd=1

  • DR. ROBERT MALONE’S WARNING TO ALL PARENTS ON MRNA VACCINES

https://fos-sa.org/?p=7256

  • Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch- Dark Horse Podcast Interview

https://odysee.com/@blasiusgeorge:9/Robert-Malone—Dark-Horse-Podcast-Interview:b

  • Dr. Malone and Dr. Navarro – The Most Important Conversation of 2021

https://www.bitchute.com/video/yHe7oEjKoPsw/

  • Substack

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/

Peter McCollough, MD

  • Texas Covid Symposium: Dr. Peter McCullough, December 11th, 2021

https://odysee.com/@LockdownSkepticism:f/Dr_Peter_McCullough_Covid_Symposium_in_Burleson_Texas_December_3:9

  • The Omicron Variant: Dr Peter McCullough, Dec 23, 2021

https://peoplesworldwar.com/the-omicron-scariant-dr-peter-mccullough/

  • Covid: The Path Not Taken – DarkHorse Podcast with Dr. Peter McCullough, December 8th, 2021

https://odysee.com/@thisweekinfascism:3/Covid_-The-Path-not-Taken—DarkHorse-Podcast-with-Dr.-Peter-McCullough:d

  • Dr Peter McCullough Interview – The Vaccines are Killing People, November 26th, 2021

https://odysee.com/@BannedYouTubeVideos:4/Dr-Peter-McCullough-Interview-The-Vaccines-are-Killing-People:b

Philip Anthony McMillan, MD

http://drphilipmcmillan.com/

Joseph Mercola, MD

https://www.mercola.com/

Lee Merrit, MD

https://www.drleemerritt.com/

https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Lee-Merritt-Session-86-en:f

Abdul Alim Mohammed, MD

https://www.bitchute.com/video/eEQ0sJVhe7Wu/

Chrisina Parks, PhD

Dr Christina Parks explains what media won’t tell you about the virus

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nx7rcKURuck

Pam Popper, MD

https://drpampopper.com/about-pam/

  • Interview with Pam Popper

https://odysee.com/@DocoMan:1/Pam-Popper-_-Full-Interview-_-Planet-Lockdown-Hirou0W8Pt8:6

https://www.ourgreatawakening.org/dr-pam-popper/

Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency

https://phmpt.org/

Jessica Rose, PhD

https://i-do-not-consent.netlify.app/

  • A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products

https://jessicar.substack.com/p/a-report-on-myocarditis-adverse-events

  • Jessica Rose: VAERS, Myocarditis, COVID Vaccines, and So Much More

            https://chrismasterjohnphd.com/blog/2021/12/27/jessica-rose-adverse-events-reporting-     and-much-more

MikeYeadon, PhD

  • Dr. Mike Yeadon | Session 86: The Fog Is Lifting – January 7th, 2022

https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Mike-Session-86-en:0

  • Dr. Michael Yeadon, October 30th, 2021

https://odysee.com/@jaylyons57:3/Dr-Michael-Yeadon-Pfizer:b

  • Former Pfizer VP Latest Message On Covid Vaccines, October 25th, 2021

https://odysee.com/@wtf:57/banned-video:1e

  • Interview with Michael Yeadon | Fertility & the Jab | Planet Lockdown, October 13th, 2021

https://odysee.com/@PlanetLockdown:6/Michael-Yeadon—Fertility—the-Jab—Planet-Lockdown:6

  • PFIZER VP: “THE THING TO BE TERRIFIED OF IS YOUR GOVERNMENT”

            POSTED: June 14, 2021

https://thehighwire.com/videos/pfizer-vp-the-thing-to-be-terrified-of-is-your-government/

  • Episode 219: IN HARM’S WAY. ORIGINAL AIR-DATE: June 10, 2021

https://thehighwire.com/videos/episode-219-in-harms-way/

Vladimir Zelinko, MD

https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/

  • COVID-19 Injections And Lifespan Dr. Joseph Mercola Interviews Dr. Vladimir Zelenko

            https://odysee.com/@yellowgenius:0/COVID-19-Injections-And-Lifespan-Dr-Joseph-      Mercola-Interviews-Dr-Vladimir-Zelenko:8

World Council for Health

Spike Protein Detox Guide, Posted on November 30, 2021 Updated on December 2, 2021

https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/resources/spike-protein-detox-guide/

  1. INTERNATIONAL CRITICAL THINKING AND

    INVESTIGATION

Sharyl Attkisson

https://sharylattkisson.com/full_measure_station-list/

Russell Brand

https://www.russellbrand.com/

Corona Fraud.com

https://www.coronafraud.com/

Corona Investigative Committee

https://corona-ausschuss.de/en/

  • Summary of findings of the Corona Investigative Committee Status 09/15/2021

https://odysee.com/@science.nikipress.com:4/getfvid_10000000_444821183495628_8989642761225796496_n:0

  • Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Michael Swinwood with Major Russ Cooper – 17 Aug 2021

https://odysee.com/@BackToTheLight:7/Major-Russ-Cooper-in-hot-with-Reiner-Fuellmich-and-Michael-Swinwood–17-Aug-2021:7

  • Prof. Alexandra Henrion-Caude | Session 79: Technocracy Gone Wild, November 21st, 2021

https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Prof-Alexandra-Henrion-Caude-session-79-en:e

see 13:15 – 2950 (mRNA injections are gene modification of human beings, not “vaccines”); 30:00 – 35:52 (unknown epigenics and potential modification of fetuses); 49:38 – 54:50 (oncogenesis and mRNA injections); 55:00 – 108:35 (fertility issues, pregnancy and post-partum); 1:09 – 1:15:10 (contaminants in injections)

Edward Dowd

https://gettr.com/user/EdwardDowd

  • REINER FUELLMICH TALKS WITH FORMER BLACKROCK BANKER EDWARD DOWD

https://odysee.com/@CosmicEvent:5/%E2%81%A3REINER-FUELLMICH-TALKS-WITH-FORMER-BLACKROCK-BANKER-%E2%81%A3EDWARD-DOWD:9

  • The Intelligence Briefing John B Wells & Edward Dowd

https://odysee.com/@keyholejourney:7/The-Intelligence-Briefing-John-B-Wells—Edward-Dowd:5

  • Edward Dowd worked for BlackRock and is speaking truths.

            https://odysee.com/@yellowgenius:0/Look-at-the-stocks-of-Insurance-companies-and-      funeral-companies.:0

  • Edward Dowd interviewed by Steve Banon

https://odysee.com/$/search?q=Edward%20Dowd%20and%20steve%20Banon

Mattias Desmet, PhD

  • Prof. Mattias Desmet | Sitzung 87: Wir sind alle David, January 14th, 2022

https://odysee.com/@Corona-Ausschuss:3/Prof.-Mattias-Desmet-Sitzung-87-de:1

  • Dr. Mattias Desmet, Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Peter McCullough (Mass Formation Psychosis), January 4th, 2022

https://odysee.com/@yabba:e/Dr.-Mattias-Desmet,-Dr.-Robert-Malone,-Dr.-Peter-McCullough-(Mass-Formation-Psychosis)-:0

  • Mattias Desmet on Our Grave Situation, December 2nd, 2021

https://odysee.com/@Chris_Martenson:2/mattias-desmet-on-our-grave-situation:6

  • Mattias Desmet on Mass Formation: The monster that devours its own children

https://peakprosperity.com/mattias-desmet-on-mass-formation/

  • Prof. Mattias Desmet on Aubrey Marcus Podcast – Why People WILLINGLY Give Up Their Freedoms, November 30th, 2021

https://odysee.com/@BackToTheLight:7/Why-People-WILLINGLY-Give-Up-Their-Freedoms-W-Prof.-Mattias-Desmet–Aubrey-Marcus-Podcast:f

https://covidvaccinesideeffects.com/mattias-desmet-on-mass-formation-psychosis/

Jeremy R. Hammond – Empowering Independent Journalism

https://www.jeremyrhammond.com/

Robert Kennedy Jr.

Children’s Health Defense.org

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/

  • The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/fauci_info/

  • Medical Imperialism Driven by Pure Greed: An Interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., September 16th, 2021

https://odysee.com/@Chris_Martenson:2/Kennedy:e

  • James Corbett: The REAL Anthony Fauci with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/flVss5cdRqs0/

Steve Kirsch, PhD

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/

  • The Right Way to Handel the pandemic

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-right-way-to-handle-the-pandemic?s=r

Tess Lawrie, MD

A Letter to Dr Andrew Hill | Dr Tess Lawrie

https://rumble.com/vwfia3-a-letter-to-andrew-hill-dr-tess-lawrie-oracle-films.html

David Martin, PhD

https://www.davidmartin.world/

  • David Martin with Vaccine Choice Canada, August 18th, 2021

https://odysee.com/@Infoweapons:1/David-Martin-with-Vaccine-Choice-Canada:f

  • Reiner Fuellmich interviews David Martin, July 21st, 2021

https://odysee.com/@vaccines-covid-nwo:3/JgxEMA02opvp:6

  • Dr. David Martin – Weaponized/Patented Bioweapon – Weston A. Price Foundation

https://ugetube.com/watch/dr-david-martin-weaponized-patented-bioweapon-weston-a-price-foundation_HPE6nCm71N1RrmC.html?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=uBwmwhCM0cMLdknPDn4TWsBSCKBZq.lw51J_DcBfrqY-1642198327-0-gaNycGzNCD0

  • Dr. Joseph Mercola interview with Dr. David Martin, October 4th, 2021

https://odysee.com/@JoeSpindler:5/Mercola_Martin:b

  • Mike Adams interview with Dr. David Martin

https://odysee.com/@JoeSpindler:5/Adams_Martin:8

  • Dr. David Martin – Weaponized/Patented Bioweapon – Weston A. Price Foundation

https://ugetube.com/watch/dr-david-martin-weaponized-patented-bioweapon-weston-a-price-foundation_HPE6nCm71N1RrmC.html?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=uBwmwhCM0cMLdknPDn4TWsBSCKBZq.lw51J_DcBfrqY-1642198327-0-gaNycGzNCD0

  • The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier

https://www.davidmartin.world/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/The_Fauci_COVID-19_Dossier.pdf

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. ~ Interviews Dr. David Martin about Fauci, Moderna, Corruption

https://www.bitchute.com/video/eQj2MwpwgTgA/

  • David Martin: Follow the Patents……It will take you to the money

https://peoplesworldwar.com/wp-https://peoplesworldwar.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Dr_David_Martin_Presentation_Slides_Privateers,_Pirates,_Orchestra.pdf

  • Government Conspirators
  • Australia
  • Canada
  • China
  • Germany
  • New Zealand
  • South Africa
  • UK
  • USA
  • Individual profiteers

            The Names, Board of Trustees “The Names of the People Killing Humanity”

            1. Al Gore, Vice-President of the United States (1993-2001), Chairman and Co-Founder,

                Generation Investment Management LLP

            2. Andre Hoffmann, Vice- Chairman, Roche

            3. Angel Gurria, QECD

            4. Bill Gates, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

  • GAVI – The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations

https://www.gavi.org/

https://newspunch.com/bill-gates-linked-lab-developing-vaccine-that-spreads-like-a-virus-to-vaccinate-anti-vaxxers/

  • Bill Gates says it would be a ‘tragedy’ to pass up a controversial, revolutionary gene-editing technology

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/bill-gates-pushing-genetic-editing-with-crispr-2018-4

            5. Christine Lagarde, President European Central Bank

            6. Chrystia Freeland, Deputy Prime Minister & Minister of Finance, Office of the

                Deputy Prime minister of Canada

            7. David M. Rubenstein, Co-Founder and Co-Executive Chairman, Carlyle Group

            8. Dustin Moskovitz, Open Philanthropy

            https://brandnewtube.com/watch/dustin-moskovitz-wanted-for-crimes-against-            humanity_cVKY7etsnGrN76f.html

https://www.barrons.com/articles/asana-asan-stock-ceo-dustin-moskovitz-51644855147

  1. Fabiola Gianotti, Director-General, European Organisation for Nuclear Research

(CERN)

            10. Feike Sybesma, Chairman of the Supervisory Board, Royal Philips

            11. H.M. Queen Rania Al Abdullah of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, Queen of

                  the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, Office of H.M Queen Rania Al Abdullah

            12. Heizo Takenaka, Professor Emeritus, Keio University

            13. Herman Gref, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, Sberbank

            14. Jim Hagemann Snabe,Chairman Siemens

            15. Julie Sweet, Chief Executive Officer, Accenture

            16. Klaus Schwab, Founder, and Executive Chairman, World Economic Forum

            17. Kristalina Georgieva, Managing Director, International Monetary Fund (IMF)

            18. L. Rafael Reif, President, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

            19. Larry Page, Google

            20. Laurence D Fink, Chair and Chief Executive Officer, BlackRock

            21. Luis Alberto Moreno, Member of the Board of Trustees World Economic Forum

            22. Marc Benioff, Chair and Chief Executive Officer, Salesforce

            23. Mark Carney, United Nations Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance,

                  United Nations

            24. Mark Schneider, Chief Executive Officer, Nestle

            25. Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook

            26. Mukesh D Ambani, Chairman and Managing Director of Reliance Industries

            27. Orit Gadiesh, Chairman, Bain & Company

            28. Patrice Motsepe, Founder and Executive Chairman, African Rainbow Minerals

            29. Paula Ingabire, Minister of Information Technology and Innovation, Ministry of

                  Information Communication Technology and Innovation of Rwanda

            30. Peter Brabeck-Latmathe, Vice Chairman of the Board of Trustees, World

                  Economic Forum

            31. Peter Maurer, President, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)

            32. Robert Mercer, Renaissance Fund

            33. Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Senior Minister, Government of Singapore

            34. Thomas Buberi, Chief Executive Officer, AXA

            35. Yo-Yo Ma, Cellist

            36. Zhu Min, Chairman, National Institute of Financial Research

Chris Martin, PhD

Peak Prosperity

https://odysee.com/@Chris_Martenson:2

  • Odds Increase that SARS CoV-2 was Lab Made, September 21st, 2021

https://odysee.com/@Chris_Martenson:2/odds-increase-that-sars-cov-2-was-lab:f

Meryl Nass, MD

Truth in the Age of Covid

https://merylnassmd.com/

Plandemic

https://plandemicseries.com/

Planet Lockdown

  • Planet Lockdown: A documentary, January 18th, 2022

https://odysee.com/@go1dleaf:f/planet-lockdown-a-documentary:4

https://odysee.com/@VideosBannedFromYoutube:a/Planet-Lockdown:f

Catherine Austin Fitts at Solari Report

Solari Report – Actionable Intelligence to Live a Free

https://home.solari.com/

  • Catherine Austine Fitts, Planet Lockdown, December 29th, 2020

https://odysee.com/@VideosBannedFromYoutube:a/Planet-Lockdown:f

Dark Horse podcast with Brett Weinstein and

https://player.fm/series/bret-weinstein-darkhorse-podcast

Pandemic Parallax View at ratical.org

https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxView/

Paul Schreyer

Pandemic Simulation Games – Preparation for a New Era

Apr 26, 2021

https://odysee.com/@WakeUpMirror:3/PS-PSG:f

https://erminioantoniocom.wordpress.com/2021/07/03/paul-schreyer-pandemic-simulation-games-preparation-for-a-new-era/

Rosettasister’s Weblog

The Testimonies Project: Israeli vaccine documentary is shocking

https://rosettasister.wordpress.com/2021/10/02/the-testimonies-project-israeli-vaccine-documentary-is-shocking-written-by-mark-schwendau-sep-27-2021/

The Highwire with Del Bigtree

https://thehighwire.com/

Trial Site News

https://trialsitenews.com/

Patrick Wood

https://globalbem.com/patrick-wood/

  • Patrick Wood | Session 79: Technocracy Gone Wild, November 21st, 2021

https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Patrick-Wood-session-79-en:c

UKColumn.org

https://www.ukcolumn.org/

World Freedom Alliance (Australia)

https://worldfreedomalliance.org/au/about/

14. COVID-RELATED INTERNATIONAL LAW,

      RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES

India

  • World’s First Vaccine Murder case against Bill Gates, Adar Poonawalla filed in India’s High Court. [Kiran Yadav Vs. State and ors.Criminal Writ Petition (St.) 18017 of 2021]

https://indianbarassociation.in/worlds-first-vaccine-murder-case-against-bill-gates-adar-poonawalla-filed-in-indias-high-court/

South Africa

https://truthcomestolight.com/ricardo-maarman-thousands-of-south-africans-file-constitutional-lawsuit-against-the-president-speaker-of-parliament-governor-of-sa-reserve-bank-for-pandemic-related-crimes-against-south-afric/

  • Court case affidavit

https://50bfc63a-1b14-4595-8da1-c38639c33338.filesusr.com/ugd/7a8151_b270e395ba2e44828c6c1587ab1a7702.pdf

United Kingdom

  • Application to International Criminal Court

https://www.docdroid.com/WUjv6iw/icc-complaint-7-1-pdf

International Criminal Court suit filed on behalf of UK victims of COVID-19 experimental injections by:

Hannah Rose – Lawyer and human rights activist

Dr Mike Yeadon – Qualified life science researcher with a degree in biochemistry in toxicology, and a research-based PhD in respiratory pharmacology, former Vice President and Chief Scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer

Piers Corbyn – Astrophysicist and activist

Mark Sexton – Retired Police officer

John O’Loony – Funeral Director and activist

Johnny McStay – Activist

Louise Shotbolt – Nurse and human rights activist

https://www.docdroid.com/WUjv6iw/icc-complaint-7-1-pdf

Based on the extensive claims and enclosed documentation, we charge those responsible for

numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression in the United Kingdom, but not limited to individuals in these countries. Perpetrators:

Prime Minister for the United Kingdom BORIS JOHNSON, Chief Medical

Officer for England and Chief Medical Adviser to the UK Government CHRISTOPHER

WHITTY, (former) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care MATTHEW HANCOCK,

(current) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care SAJID JAVID, Chief Executive of

Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) JUNE RAINE, Director-

General of the World Health Organisation TEDROS ADANHOM GHEBREYESUS, Cochair

of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation WILLIAM GATES III and Co-chair of the

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation MELINDA GATES, Chairman and Chief executive

officer of Pfizer ALBERT BOURLA, Chief Executive Officer of AstraZeneca STEPHANE

BANCEL, Chief Executive Officer of Moderna PASCAL SORIOT, Chief Executive of Johnson and Johnson ALEX GORSKY, President of the Rockefeller Foundation DR RAJIV

SHAH, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) DR

ANTHONY FAUCI, Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum

KLAUS SCWAB, President of EcoHealth Alliance DR PETER DASZACK

Criminal Investigation filing Case no: 6029679/21

https://pjhlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/letterMHRA.pdf

United States of America

Francis Boyle

  • Dr. Francis Boyle Darpa’s Biowarfare Weapon Vaccine Will Kill People, December 18th, 2020

https://odysee.com/@AlexJonesChannel:c/Dr.-Francis-Boyle–Darpa’s-Biowarfare-Weapon-Vaccine-Will-Kill-People:0

  • Roadmap for Prosecuting COVID Crimes- Interview with Francis A. Boyle, November 30th, 2021

            https://odysee.com/@BNN:6/Roadmap-for-Prosecuting-COVID-Crimes–Interview-with- Francis-A.-Boyle:5

  • Prof+Lawyer Francis Boyle: US COVID Crimes Legal Action Campaign. October 28th, 2021

https://odysee.com/@PandemicParallaxView:6/Boyle-CovidCrimesLegalActionCampaign:8

Informed Consent Action Network

https://www.icandecide.org/

Aaron Siri

https://substack.com/profile/32334676-aaron-siri

BUZZ PHOTOS, FREEDOM WATCH, Inc., LARRY KLAYMAN, a Natural Person

and Members of the Class and Subclasses and Those Similarly Situated

Plaintiffs v. THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA and THE PEOPLE’S LIBERATION ARMY, The official military of China and THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY,

and agency of the Government of China and SHI ZHENGLI, Director of

the Wuhan Institute of Virology

  • Class action suit against Chinese government for release of COVID-19

Case 3:20-cv-00656-K-BN Document 1 Filed 03/17/20

https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/pdf_upload-371654.pdf

Rights and Freedoms

https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/

  • COVID Fraud – Lawyers; Medical Experts start legal proceedings against W.H.O and World Leaders for ‘Crimes against Humanity’

https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/05/12/covid-fraud-lawyers-medical-experts-start-legal-proceedings-against-w-h-o-and-world-leaders-for-crimes-against-humanity/

15.  PLANDEMIC PLANNING AND GOVERNMENT

       AGENCIES

UK GOVERNMENT

  • The Cygnus Report: Tier one command post exercise pandemic influenza, 18 to 20 October 2016

            https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attac            hment_data/file/927770/exercise-cygnus-report.pdf

USA

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

https://www.cdc.gov/

  • Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)

https://vaers.hhs.gov/

  • VAERS: Covid Injections Cause 11,000 Deaths & 48,385 Serious Injuries According to CDC

https://stateofthenation.co/?p=74164

  • CDC Emails: Our Definition of Vaccine is “Problematic”

https://technofog.substack.com/p/cdc-emails-our-definition-of-vaccine?s=r

  • CDC FOUNDATION IS NOT A GOVERNMENT ENTITY, HAS MANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

https://exposingmedicaltyranny.wordpress.com/2021/09/16/cdc-foundation-is-not-a-government-entity-has-many-conflicts-of-interest-2/

Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

https://www.fda.gov/

  • Why is the FDA funded in part by the companies it regulates?

https://theconversation.com/why-is-the-fda-funded-in-part-by-the-companies-it-regulates-160444

  • INSTEAD OF FDA’S REQUESTED 500 PAGES PER MONTH, COURT ORDERS FDA TO PRODUCE PFIZER COVID-19 DATA AT RATE OF 55,000 PAGES PER MONTH!

https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/instead-of-fdas-requested-500-pages?justPublished=true

Johnson & Johnson

https://www.jnj.com/

Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health

  • Atlantic Storm/Clade X

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/events/2018_clade_x_exercise/about-clade-x

  • DARK WINTER: Bioterrorism Exercise Andrews Air Force Base. June 22-23, 2001
  • PROPERTY of Johns Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense, Center for Strategic and International Studies, ANSER, & Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/events-archive/2001_dark-winter/

  • Event 201 exercise
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • World Economic Forum

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/about

  • The SPARS Pandemic 2025–2028: A Futuristic Scenario to Facilitate Medical Countermeasure Communication

Moderna

https://www.modernatx.com/

  • Scientists find DNA sequence in SARS-CoV-2 that was patented by Moderna three years prior to the covid-19 scandal

https://sciencefraud.news/2022-03-01-scientists-find-dna-sequence-sars-covid2-patented-by-moderna-three-years-prior.html

  • Scientists claim Covid virus contains tiny chunk of DNA that ‘matches sequence patented by Moderna THREE YEARS before pandemic began’

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10272221/Pfizer-Moderna-shareholders-pocket-7-5bn-week-Omicron-discovered.html

  • Pfizer and Moderna shareholders pocket £7.8billion in a week after Omicron was discovered

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10542309/Fresh-lab-leak-fears-study-finds-genetic-code-Covids-spike-protein-linked-Moderna-patent.html

  • Scientists claim Covid virus contains tiny chunk of DNA that ‘matches sequence patented by Moderna THREE YEARS before pandemic began’

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10542309/Fresh-lab-leak-fears-study-finds-genetic-code-Covids-spike-protein-linked-Moderna-patent.html

  • Scientists find DNA sequence in SARS-CoV-2 that was patented by Moderna three years prior to the covid-19 scandal

https://sciencefraud.news/2022-03-01-scientists-find-dna-sequence-sars-covid2-patented-by-moderna-three-years-prior.html

  • Foreign substance detected in Moderna vaccine in Japan may be metal

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2021/08/27/national/moderna-contamination-metal/

Pfizer (USA)

https://www.pfizer.com/

  • Canine coronavirus S gene and uses therefor (2000) – Pfizer Inc.

https://patents.justia.com/patent/6372224

  • INSTEAD OF FDA’S REQUESTED 500 PAGES PER MONTH, COURT ORDERS FDA TO PRODUCE PFIZER COVID-19 DATA AT RATE OF 55,000 PAGES PER MONTH!

https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/instead-of-fdas-requested-500-pages?justPublished=true

  • Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for an Unapproved Product Review Memorandum

https://www.fda.gov/media/144416/download

  • Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial

https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635.full.pdf

  • Official documents reveal enormous gap between what FDA and Pfizer would attest to, compared to what the public was told about the Pfizer COVID vaccine

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/official-documents-reveal-enormous?s=r

  • ‘Utterly Obscene’: Just 8 Pfizer and Moderna Investors Became $10 Billion Richer After Omicron Emerged

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2021/12/05/utterly-obscene-just-8-pfizer-and-moderna-investors-became-10-billion-richer-after

  • Pfizer report reveals serious health risks of covid vaccine Government didn’t warn you about

https://thebuzz.nz/pfizer-report-reveals-serious-health-risks-of-covid-vaccine-government-didnt-warn-you-about/

  • CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT

REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021

https://thebuzz.nz/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

  • Scandal Behind the FDA Fake Approval of Pfizer Jab

https://journal-neo.org/2021/08/30/scandal-behind-the-fda-fake-approval-of-pfizer-jab/

  • Who owns Pfizer?

https://stockzoa.com/ticker/pfe/

  • 8 Top Pfizer, Moderna Shareholders $10 Billion Richer After Media Hypes Omicron Scariant

https://truthbasedmedia.com/2021/12/07/8-top-pfizer-moderna-shareholders-10-billion-richer-after-media-hypes-omicron-scariant/

  • ‘Utterly Obscene’: Just 8 Pfizer and Moderna Investors Became $10 Billion Richer After Omicron Emerged

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2021/12/05/utterly-obscene-just-8-pfizer-and-moderna-investors-became-10-billion-richer-after

  • Scandal Behind the FDA Fake Approval of Pfizer Jab

https://journal-neo.org/2021/08/30/scandal-behind-the-fda-fake-approval-of-pfizer-jab/

  • Pfizer and Moderna shareholders pocket £7.8billion in a week after Omicron was discovered

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10542309/Fresh-lab-leak-fears-study-finds-genetic-code-Covids-spike-protein-linked-Moderna-patent.html

  • REINER FUELLMICH TALKS WITH FORMER BLACKROCK BANKER EDWARD DOWD

            https://odysee.com/@CosmicEvent:5/%E2%81%A3REINER-FUELLMICH-TALKS-     WITH-FORMER-BLACKROCK-BANKER-%E2%81%A3EDWARD-DOWD:9

  • Edward Dowd worked for BlackRock and is speaking truths.

https://odysee.com/@yellowgenius:0/Look-at-the-stocks-of-Insurance-companies-and-funeral-companies.:0

  • Pfizer’s Scandal in Nigeria – How An Experimental Vaccine Killed 11 Children in 1996

https://www.africanexponent.com/post/8120-pfizers-scandal-in-nigeria-how-an-experimental-vaccine-killed-11-children-in-1996

Rockefeller Foundations

  • The General Education Board

https://rockfound.rockarch.org/general_education_board

  • The Commons Project

https://thecommonsproject.org/about

  • A non-profit public trust established with support from the Rockefeller Foundation, The Commons Project Foundation builds and operates digital platforms and services for the common good. Our mission-driven structure is designed to attract world-class talent to build and sustain digital public services in a way that serves people’s interests above all. Beginning with health information, we are focused on empowering people to access and control their personal data and put it to use for their own benefit.
  • The Commons Project Foundation and its first project CommonHealth were founded in 2019. More recently, The Commons Project developed CommonPass, an application and data-sharing structure that enables individuals to securely prove their COVID-19 health status for travel and other purposes, without revealing other, extraneous personal data.
  • Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development

            https://truthcomestolight.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Rockefeller-Foundation-          2010-Scenarios-for-the-Future-of-Technology-and-International-Development.pdf

  • Alabama: Tuskegee Institute National Historic Site

https://www.nps.gov/articles/tuskinstitute.htm

  • Medical mafia, Big Pharma and the Rockerfeller Allopathic medico-drug cartel

https://www.bitchute.com/video/BzeVGy7VTs2g/

  • The history of the pharmaceutical industry: greed and corpses

            https://transversewaves.ca/2021/03/06/the-history-of-the-pharmaceutical-industry-greed-   and-corpses/

  • The Rockefeller-Carnegie Big Pharma Scam

            http://www.blissfulvisions.com/articles/Rockefeller-Carnegie-Big-Pharma-Scam.html

  • The Truth About The Rockefeller Drug Empire

            http://www.healingcancernaturally.com/rockefeller-drug-empire-story.html

  • Episode 286 – Rockefeller Medicine

https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-286-rockefeller-medicine/

WHO

https://www.who.int/

  • CONSTITUTION OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

https://www.who.int/governance/eb/who_constitution_en.pdf

  • WHO Pandemic Treaty: The makings of a New World Order?

https://www.bizcommunity.com/Article/196/148/225648.html

            https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/politics/senior-who-official-under-investigation-by-  italian-            judiciary/46537310

  • Astrid Stuckelberger: Exposing Corruption At WHO, posted on December 16, 2021

https://www.bitchute.com/video/hX3ZnJFNEiOb/

World Economic Forum (Klaus Schwab)

https://www.weforum.org/

  • COVID-19: The Great Rest

https://carterheavyindustries.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/covid-19_-the-great-reset-klaus-schwab.pdf

  1.    MAD SCIENTISTS: SARS 1 AND SARS 2,

    INJECTION BIOWEAPON, GAIN-OF-

    FUNCTION RESEARCH AND PATENTS

Ralph Baric

  • A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence

https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985.pdf

  • Two Mutations Were Critical for Bat-to-Human Transmission of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (2015)

https://msi.umn.edu/~lifang/flpapers/fang_li_jvi_mers_mutations_2015.pdf

  • Patent: Methods for producing recombinant coronavirus (2002)

https://patents.justia.com/patent/7279327

  • Patent: Directional assembly of large viral genomes and chromosomes (2001)

https://patents.justia.com/patent/6593111

Peter Daszak

  • Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance Has Hidden Almost $40 Million In Pentagon Funding And Militarized Pandemic Science

            https://www.independentsciencenews.org/news/peter-daszaks-ecohealth-alliance-has-        hidden-almost-40-million-in-pentagon-funding/

Anthony Fauci

  • The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier: This document is prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin.

            https://www.corona-ausschuss.de/wp-           content/uploads/2021/07/FauciDossierWordFileText.pdf

  • NIAID-USAID Funded Wuhan Gain-of-Function Full Paper; Rand Paul to File Criminal Referral to DOJ Re Fauci

https://miningawareness.wordpress.com/2021/07/22/niaid-usaid-funded-wuhan-gain-of-function-full-paper-rand-paul-to-file-criminal-referral-to-doj-re-fauci/

  • Anthony Fauci on Bioterrorism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTJzKJwtfDw

  • Lerner, Sharon and Mara Hvistendahl. 2021. New Details Emerge About Coronavirus Research at Chinese Lab

https://theintercept.com/2021/09/06/new-details-emerge-about-coronavirus-research-at-chinese-lab/

  • Anthony Fauci on Bioterrorism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTJzKJwtfDw

  1.    PCR FRAUD

Christian Drosten

  • Christian Drosten & the Fraud Behind COVID 19 PCR Testing

https://principia-scientific.com/christian-drosten-the-fraud-behind-covid-19-pcr-testing/

  • Caught Red-Handed: CDC Changes Test Thresholds To Virtually Eliminate New COVID Cases Among Vaxx’d

https://globalcommunityweekly.substack.com/p/caught-red-handed-cdc-changes-test?s=r

  • Corona Investigative Committee Grand Jury “Day 3: PCR Test”

https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-Day-3-en-online:7

  1.       CORPORATE/STATE MEDIA PROPANGANDA

Pugliese, David. 2021, Sept. 27.  Military leaders saw pandemic as unique opportunity to test propaganda on Canadians: report. Ottawa Citizen. (Canada) https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/military-leaders-saw-pandemic-as-unique-opportunity-to-test-propaganda-techniques-on-canadians-forces-report-says

MINDSPACE: Influencing behaviour through public policy (UK)

https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications/mindspace

Behavioural Government: Using behavioural science to improve how governments make decisions (UK)

https://www.bi.team/publications/behavioural-government/

The Corona Paper — Covid-19 is a ‘Global False Alarm’ (Germany)

https://gatesofvienna.net/2020/09/the-corona-paper-covid-19-is-a-global-false-alarm/

Trusted News Initiative

https://www.bbc.com/beyondfakenews/trusted-news-initiative/

  • What is the Trusted News Initiative?, November 20th, 2021

https://odysee.com/@PANDA:3b/trustednewsinitiative:d

  • Robert Malone, MD, MS.

Dec 25, 2021_On “Science” and Controversy: Infectious disease outbreaks require constant re-evaluation of accepted truth

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/on-science-and-controversy

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

https://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/silent-weapons-for-quiet-wars.pdf

Saudi state part owns Evening Standard and Independent, courts told. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/jul/23/evening-standard-and-independent-unable-to-rebut-concerns-over-saudi-ownership

Bill Gates

  • Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) donors & partners: WHO says thank you!

https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/donors-and-partners/funding

  • Documents show Bill Gates has given $319 million to media outlets to promote his global agenda

https://thegrayzone.com/2021/11/21/bill-gates-million-media-outlets-global-agenda/

  • Philanthropic partnerships at the Guardian

https://www.theguardian.com/info/2018/oct/02/philanthropic-partnerships-at-the-guardian

  • Who Is Bill Gates?

https://www.corbettreport.com/gates/

  • Bill Gates Faces Trial in India for Illegally Testing Tribal Children with Vaccines

https://naturalsociety.com/bill-gates-faces-trial-india-illegally-testing-tribal-children-vaccines/

George Soros

  • Good Information Inc.

https://goodinfo.us/info/

  • EXCLUSIVE: How George Soros influences Canadian government

https://www.rebelnews.com/how_george_soros_influences_the_canadian_government_part_one

  1. BIO-WARFARE, SECRET RESEARCH OPERATIONS, LAB ‘LEAKS’, MEDICAL EXPERIMENTATION, RACE AND EUGENICS

Appel, J. M. 2009. Is All Fair in Biological Warfare? The Controversy over Genetically Engineered Biological Weapons. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(7): 429-432.

https://jme.bmj.com/content/35/7/429

WHO says it advised Ukraine to destroy pathogens in health labs to prevent disease spread. Reuters.

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/exclusive-who-says-it-advised-ukraine-destroy-pathogens-health-labs-prevent-2022-03-11/

Is Ukraine Destroying Evidence of US-Funded Bioweapons Program?

https://thewashingtonstandard.com/is-ukraine-destroying-evidence-of-us-funded-bioweapons-program/

How deadly pathogens have escaped the lab — over and over again

https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/3/20/18260669/deadly-pathogens-escape-lab-smallpox-bird-flu

Here Are 5 Times Infectious Diseases Escaped From Laboratory Containment

https://www.businessinsider.com/5-terrifying-times-pandemics-escaped-from-laboratories-2014-7?op=1

SARS escaped Beijing lab twice

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7096887/pdf/13059_2004_Article_4944.pdf

CDC keeps secret its mishaps with deadly germs

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/01/04/cdc-secret-lab-incidents-select-agents/95972126/

A Russian lab containing smallpox and Ebola exploded

https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/9/18/20870537/smallpox-ebola-russian-lab-explosion-pathogens-escape

China Reports SARS Death Caused by Lab Leak

https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20040423/china-sars-death

Reanalysis of the anthrax epidemic in Rhodesia, 1978–1984

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111893/pdf/peerj-04-2686.pdf

The CIA’s Secret Experiments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXHBF5O5uAM

Anthrax Epizootic in Zimbabwe, 1978-1980: Due to Deliberate Spread?

http://whale.to/vaccine/anthrax_epizootic.html

UNIT 731 Japanese Human Experimentation – The Aftermath

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBx59FETU30

Anthony Fauci on Bioterrorism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTJzKJwtfDw

A History Of US Secret Human Experimentation

https://rense.com/general36/history.htm

The Century of the Self

Maafa 21 – Black Genocide in 21st Century America

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6XfU8KVkzI

Human Resources

https://topdocumentaryfilms.com/human-resources/

Mind Control – America’s Secret War

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNv_VOn4puY

Project Coast

https://www.unidir.org/files/publications/pdfs/project-coast-apartheid-s-chemical-and-biological-warfare-programme-296.pdf

Information about Military and Civilian Biodefense/Terrorism Countermeasures, vaccines, laws and policies. MBVP NEWS

https://mbvic.blogspot.com/2004/10/biological-threat-assessment-is-cure.html

Miller, Judith., Stephen Engelberg and William J. Broad. 2001. Germs: Biological Weapons and America’s Secret War. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Miller, Judith., Stephen Engelberg and William J. Broad. 2001, Sept. 4. U.S. Germ Warfare Research Pushes Treaty Limits. New York Times.

CIA Link to Cuban Pig Virus Reported

https://www.uky.edu/~rmfarl2/cubabio1.htm

  •   READINGS IN THE HISTORICAL-SOCIOLOGY

  OF THE ‘THERAPEUTIC STATE’ AND

  MEDICALLY-INDUCED TYRANNY

Black, Edwin. 2003. War against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.

British Medical Association. 1992. Medicine Betrayed: The Participation of Doctors in Human Rights Abuses. London: Zed Books.

Conrad, Peter. 2007. The medicalization of society: On the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Conrad, Peter and Joseph W. Scheider. 1985. Deviance and Medicalization: From badness to sickness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

  • See ch. 9. “Medicine as an institution of social control: consequences for society

Honorof, Ida and Eleanor McBean. 1977. Vaccination, the Silent Killer: A clear and present danger. Sherman Oaks, CA: Cancer Book House.

https://openlibrary.org/books/OL24945690M/Vaccination_the_silent_killer

Illich, Ivan. 2002. Limits to Medicine: Medical nemesis: The expropriation of health. New York: Marion Boyars.

McBean, Eleanor. 1957. The Poisoned Needle: Suppressed Facts About Vaccination.

https://thebigvirushoax.com/the-poisoned-needle

McBean, Eleanor. 1977. Swine Flu Expose. https://archive.org/details/SwineFluExposeEleanoraMcBean1977/mode/2up

Meador, Clifton. 1994. The last well person. The New England Journal of Medicine, 330: 440-441.

Kittrie, Nicholas. 1973. The Right to be Different: Deviance and enforced therapy. Baltimore, Penguin Books

https://archive.org/details/righttobediffere00nich_0

Szasz, Thomas. 1997. The manufacture of madness; a comparative study of the Inquisition and the mental health movement. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.

Vinciguerra, Mattia and Ernesto Greco. 2020. Sars-CoV-2 and black population: ACE2 as shield or blade? Infection, Genetics and Evolution

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219352/pdf/main.pdf

Washington, Harriet. 2006. Medical Apartheid: The dark history of medical experimentation on Black Americans from colonial times to the present. New York: Doubleday.

My Blog Posts

Sept. 13, 2021

Canada’s COVID Coup

April 2, 2022

THE RATIONAL SCEPTIC’S GUIDE TO THE COVID-19 ‘PLANDEMIC’

Consent to Treatment: An absolutist perspective on bodily and mind in public policy and the law in Ontario

Introduction Ontario’s Medical Officer of (Ill)Health has exerted pressure on physicians not to write letters of accommodation for medical, religions or conscience. His is doing is nothing short of an abuse of authority, breach of public trust, a violation of the Hippocratic oath and criminal intervention in the patient-physician relationship.…

THE RATIONAL SCEPTIC’S GUIDE TO THE COVID-19 ‘PLANDEMIC’

“No attempt must be made to encase man, for it is his destiny to be set free”. Frantz Fanon. 1977. Black Skin, White Masks. “What societies really, ideally, want is a citizenry which will simply obey the rules of society.  If a society succeeds in this, that society is about…

Canada’s COVID Coup

Tamari Kitossa, PhD September 13, 2021 Obedience is the psychological mechanism that links individual action to political purpose. It is the dispositional cement that binds men to systems of authority. Facts of recent history and observation in daily life suggest that for many people obedience may be a deeply ingrained…

Canada’s COVID Coup

Tamari Kitossa, PhD

September 13, 2021

Obedience is the psychological mechanism that links individual action to political purpose. It is the dispositional cement that binds men to systems of authority. Facts of recent history and observation in daily life suggest that for many people obedience may be a deeply ingrained behavior tendency, indeed, a prepotent impulse overriding training in ethics, sympathy, and moral conduct. Stanley Milgram. Obedience to Authority: An experimental view. 2009, p. 1

Introduction

This essay is a radical socio-legal analysis of COVID pandemic psychosis in Canada. There are two parts to my thesis, and these correspond to two parts of this essay. First, federal, provincial and municipal chief officers, supported by the corporate executive class and the ‘mainstream’ news media supported by some union executive committees, are using the COVID crisis to turn Canada into a lawless nation-state. Biko Agozino has called such expropriations of democracy in Africa “executive lawlessness”. I suggest, his concept applies now to Canada. By citing government policy documents and Acts of Parliament, I show that the so-called vaccine mandate has no basis in law and is therefore not enforceable except by the totalitarian abrogation of the law itself. Second, complicit with the manipulation of an unrelenting campaign of fear, panic and scapegoating, particularly of unvaccinated persons, the mass of Canadians have conceded to throwing both their inalienable and state guaranteed rights at the feet of the executive branch’s illegal and reckless abrogation of civil, legal and human rights. This is called participatory totalitarianism. This second part of the essay uses the skill of formal logic applied to critical thinking and the use of inferential reasoning to demonstrate rational resistance and to judge one’s impulse to be obedient to authority. I demonstrate the limits of the nonsensical idea of “conspiracy theory” which is weaponized to promote obedience to authority. In doing so, I rely on the most well-placed experts in virology and immunology who help us to judge how to parse the opinions of experts. I conclude by arguing that resistance and disobedience to authority is the only thing that will preserve the rational exercise of authority.

PART I

Election or not, Canadians must ask tough questions about how the public health strategy for COVID-19 has enabled politicians and enterprises to trash the Constitution and brush aside civil liberties, legal rights and human rights. The basic question is this: By what Act of Parliament or authorization guaranteed by the Constitution of Canada can the Prime Minister, Premiers, Mayors and enterprises in Canada:

  1. compel Canadians to undergo a medical procedure (i.e., experimental COVID-19 vaccination) against their conscience, though permitting exemptions for medical, creed and religious grounds?
  2. discriminate against conscientious objectors and authorized non-vaccinated persons by means of intimidation and threats to deny goods, services, termination of labour contracts and freedom of movement?
  3. subject Canadians, by means of threat and intimidation of denial of Constitutional guarantees and human rights protections to genetic harvesting (i.e., PCR test) irrespective of medical, creed or religious exemptions?

In addition to these legal questions, are Canadian governments and business enterprises that are coercing Canadians against the sovereignty of their person contravening the principles of the Nuremburg Code and the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights?

My opinion is that with this baseless, illegal and unauthorized intrusive mandate, the guarantees of liberal democracy are revoked before our eyes, while some of us, scared out of our wits, cheer on totalitarianism. In this, Canada and other liberal democracies such as Australia are no different from China which, in a general regime of social control, conditions access to goods, services and employment on total obedience to authority.

Guaranteed by a) the Canadian Constitution, b) there being NO Act of Parliament suspending the Constitution and c) various Acts and policies affirming Constitutional Supremacy, the rule of law holds in Canada. All and sundry, therefore, are barred from exercising dictatorial power currently exercised through a so-called vaccine mandate. It must be made clear that this so-called mandate is fictitious and has no force of law to compel conformity nor to punish.

 So, in the first instance two things must be considered, and both rest on the rule of law.

First, Health Canada’s 1997 Communicable Disease Report Supplement Canadian National Report on Immunization, 1996 establishes the following, which I italize, bold and underline for effect: “Unlike some other countries immunization is not mandatory in Canada; it cannot be made mandatory because of the Canadian Constitution”. If this is not unambiguous enough, the Report adds that “It must be emphasized that…exceptions are permitted on medical or religious grounds and reasons of conscience; legislation and regulations must not be interpreted to imply compulsory immunization”. Though a general statement, this latter phrase is given emphasis in the 1997 Report because, at the time, three provinces established a legislative and regulatory regime for K-12/13 students be vaccinated. Ontario and New Foundland required proof of diphtheria, measles, mumps, polio, rubella and tetanus. Manitoba required measles, but it subsequently did away any such requirement. As currently noted on the Manitoba government health website: “No, immunizations are voluntary in Manitoba”.

Having trouble finding about the fact that no government in Canada can mandate vaccines nor punish you for not ‘voluntarily’ ceding your inalienable rights? Not surprising. Brian Peckford notes that

The Canadian National Report on Immunizations statement above was published in the May 1997 Canada Communicable Diseases Report (CCDR) by Health Canada. After the creation of the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) in 2004, the CCDR was transferred to them. The website and subsequent CCDR reports carry the PHAC designation.

But the difficulty is not only because this information is buried deep within the thicket of departments, it is also that NO government or enterprises illegally compelling Canadians is in a prominent way informing Canadians of the full range of their rights over their bodies.

Second, the Prime Minister, Premiers and business enterprises have unlawfully intimidated and threatened Canadians with “consequences” for not submitting to an unconstitutional and criminal violation of their section 7 legal rights under the Canadian Charter: “Life, Liberty and Security of the Person”. For those that refuse on grounds of conscience, which is a step removed from punitive action, one consequence is forced subjection to the PCR test which harvests their DNA to determine whether they carry the virus. Note, the vaccinated, especially given waning immunity and breakthrough infections (which they cannot get from the unvaccinated) are not subject to testing. But what does the law in fact say about life, liberty and security of the person down to our DNA? Here we refer to the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act, but first it is necessary to define what a PCR test is.

According to the National Human Genome Institute,

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a common laboratory technique used in research and clinical practices to amplify, or copy, small segments of genetic material. PCR is sometimes called “molecular photocopying,” and it is incredibly accurate and sensitive. Short sequences called primers are used to selectively amplify a specific DNA sequence. PCR was invented in the 1980s and is now used in a variety of ways, including DNA fingerprinting, diagnosing genetic disorders and detecting bacteria or viruses. Because molecular and genetic analyses require significant amounts of a DNA sample, it is nearly impossible for researchers to study isolated pieces of genetic material without PCR amplification.

So clearly, the PCR is genetic harvesting. Whatever the reason it is for is irrelevant! Now here is how Canada’s Genetic Non-Discrimination Act defines a “genetic test”:

genetic test means a test that analyzes DNA, RNA or chromosomes for purposes such as the prediction of disease or vertical transmission risks, or monitoring, diagnosis

or prognosis.

 This is relevant because section 3 of the Act prohibits forced genetic testing as a condition of:

  1. providing goods or services to that individual;
  2. entering into or continuing a contract or agreement with that individual; or
  3. offering or continuing specific terms or conditions in a contract or agreement with that individual.

So no government, whatever, can force individuals to take a genetic test. The Act further prohibits punishment for refusing to undergo testing, refusal to disclose the results if one does submit to a genetic test and that the results of the test collected or disclosed without the individual’s consent. In doing so, the federal government, provincial governments and municipal governments imposing a coercive health treatment regime are in contravention federal and provincial human rights charters.

As to Rapid Antigen Tests which only identifies antibodies to the virus, it is does not seem like the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act is applicable. Yet, the issue of coercion, intimidation, threat and surveillance to undergo an invasive procedure seems to be relevant.

It is logical to assume the statute rests on three grounds. First, an affirmation that medical practice and research in Canada is guided by the post-Nazi Nuremburg Code of Ethics, now encoded in the World Medical Association (WMA) Declaration of Helsinki – the gold standard for research and practice. Second, the demonstrable practices of Nazi Germany and the United States of America’s various secret national and extraterritorial medical experimentation programs that targeted minorities and neo-colonized countries. Finally, the prohibitions of the Act recognize the clear and present risks to individual and societal sovereignty posed by a fast moving world of market-based genomics research.

It is my opinion that the Prime Minister and Parliament are making an end run around the constitution. To disparage and refute this opinion, the righteous may cast the slurs of ‘conspiracy theory’, ‘anti-vaxxer’, ‘COVID misinformation’, ‘vaccine hesitant’ and the like. Failing this, others invoke the claim that this is a global pandemic and so whatever measures the government takes to keep us ‘safe’ is justified.

The terms of stigmatization are little more than ad hominem attacks to comfort the intellectually slothful, majoritarian cultists and authoritarian knaves who would amplify the self-deception of those blindly obedient to authority. In the first instance, there is no such thing as a “conspiracy theory”, there is only the theory of conspiracy. A theory is a theory is a theory, and a theory might be a working hypothesis. We should not believe that theories which do not conform to majoritarian induced thinking are not valid. The issue is availability and quality of evidence to support a theory. We must be open to all theories and to be capable of using formal logic to judge, but not condemn the theory or its advocates. To the extent governments and the state are racketeer enterprises that routinely wrap malfeasance behind the secretive iron curtain of ‘national security’, we are left with the ironic endorsement of Justice Muldoon that,

Canadians may shudder to realize that the security needs of a free and democratic society are, in a few basic essentials, much the same as those which totalitarian societies arrogate unto themselves. Utter secrecy, subject to certain checks, in security intelligence matters is one.

There is then, every reason, where there is a pattern of practice of conspiracy in the halls of government and corporate boardrooms, for the public to infer conspiracy where concrete evidence is unobtainable. But in liberal democracies some conspiracies are so open and transparent, that this is what makes them conspiratorial: they invite us into the conspiracy, so we cannot see it as such. When Canadians are denied goods, services and deprived of work, are we not seeing a direct parallel to the Chinese government conditioning access to goods, services and employment to ‘good civic behaviour’. How is our present condition under the “vaccine mandate” any different?

PART II

The cause of the ‘emergency’ is not to be dispelled because COVID-19 is real, however much the virus is possibly the result of a ‘lab leak’ resulting from research admittedly authorized and funded by Anthony Fauci, who, through artful dodging, denies it was “gain of function” research. The Intercept, through an FOI, has found evidence for research that Fauci funded the joint effort of Chinese and US researchers, sponsored by the National Institutes of Health in the United States which developed pathogenic viruses that could infect human respiratory cells. To get around the fact that politics is being played with public health and science, the waters are muddied by a vast COVID vaccine indoctrination campaign led by Big Pharma (Astrazenica, Johnson, Johnson and Pfizer), investors such as Bill Gates and political toadies who will no doubt join the boards of Big Pharma to write public health policy in the future. There are others, such as Dr. Richard Fleming, who take the “gain of function” hypothesis to its logical conclusion, that it is bio-warfare either gone awry or as planned. And the “vaccine” is a perverse second level of warfare against the people of the world. Whether one is persuaded by claims resulting from concrete evidentiary citation, patterns of practice or inference, to dismiss these hypothesis out of hand or to be indifferent to them is to foreclose the opportunity of citizens to demand total knowledge about what their governments are spending their tax dollars on and then to assess whether bio-chemical warfare research is something they condone.

Thus implicated in this nefarious corporate-state-moral entrepreneurial takeover of people’s bodies are government elites and a vast assortment of moral entrepreneurs who lump together non-vaccers with anti-vaccers as idiotic and obtuse anti-science zealots. The former are conscientious objectors about this particular vaccine. Some of them include people who have not been vaccinated and those who are singly and doubly vaccinated. Their point is that it is a matter of inalienable conscience and bodily sovereignty for individuals to choose what goes into their bodies, having been fully informed of the risks and that this procedure is experimental. Anti-vaccers are persons who reject vaccines altogether. But here too this is a heavy brush. Some anti-vaccers object to modern vaccine technology given the non-disclosure of ingredients, the refusal of governments to carefully track injuries and that governments have waived liability for manufacturers. Others yet are anti-vaccine as a matter of creed and religious principle. Whatever the case may be, “anti-vaccer” is used as a slur by the righteous vanguards of orthodox secular religion disparage those who dare to resist market medicalization and state control in asserting their fundamental principles. These individuals are raising important questions because pharmaceutical corporations are indemnified from legal sanction if one dies or sustains injury from the COVID-19 vaccine. This begs what recourse in law individuals have if they experience severe, debilitating and life-altering side effects from a so-called “safe” COVID-19 vaccine?

To be clear, we do not deny that an urgent, responsive and science-based public health approach is needed. The question of the Canadian governments claim that both the COVID-19 gene therapy vaccine and that its one-dimensional Big Pharma approach to public health is the ONLY valid approach is best left to the medical clinicians and research scientists. But here too, the experts are not of one mind and, importantly, scientific debate and knowledge of injuries is being suppressed. There is significant and substantial differences of opinion and the scientific community is in uproar. Against those of the dominant paradigm, others such as Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA vaccine, Peter Doshi, editor of the British Journal of Medicine, insisting on a pause in the push to inoculate for COVID-19 with a gene therapy based vaccine that is inadequately researched and rushed to market. Indeed, Sucharit Bakhti, world leading microbiologist and virologist is sounding the alarm that the world is being subjected to a massive unethical experiment that amounts to a crime against humanity. Exaggeration? Maybe. Some science commentators downplay the evidence of dangerous side-effects using the VAERS in the US. Yet, others come to very different conclusions here and here looking at the same data. Indeed, Dr. Peter McCullough argues that the CDC – through statistical shenanigans, definitional bafflegab and outright subterfuge – is burying the data of deaths and injuries from COVID vaccines.

But there is no longer any debate – the data is in. Dr. Brian Brydle, a virologist at University of Guelph, warns that the extent of vaccine injuries have a time lag as we will not know for months or many years to come whether some of the vaccinated will be infertile, suffer myocarditis, experience unknown childhood diseases from infants drinking breast milk, birth defects, and the loosening of the body’s lock on viral diseases the immune system had kept in check. Among these experts whose credentials and reputation is impeccable and who are warning us we are at the lip of an event horizon from which there is no coming back is Geert Vanden Bossche. Our political and health system leaders are, he contends, and he is not alone, doing something far worse than lockdowns. The coercive roll out of a mass experimental vaccine during a pandemic is applying selection pressure to the pathogen, forcing it to be not only more pathogenic, but also unstoppable. In effect, like antibiotic resistant bugs, we are on the cusp of a super virus immune to any known medication – which of course catastrophic because of its global scope.

Conclusion

Whom to believe? My opinion is not whom to believe, since people will believe what they will, but that we are in a full-blown coup in Canada, aided and abetted by political leaders who have never seen a means of garnering more power they did not like. We need to take an ecological approach to politics, as we should take an ecological approach to publish health regimes that do not rest on the perverse incentivization of the medical industrial complex. Because, for example, the link between COVID-19 and pollution and fires ravaging our world is apparent, so too is the link between the willful destruction of our democratic ecology with corporate-state racketeer totalitarianism raging around the world. As much as a coalition of ruling elites are using COVID-19 as a pretext to achieve perverse ends, now is the time for local and global citizens to protect what little remains of democracy by demanding that their governments obey the law, or else – since they are not the only ones who can issue ultimatums!

Freedom of conscience and control of our bodies is inalienable. Freedom of information is essential to both. It is time Canadians informed themselves and asserted their rights and refuse to obey commands that have no force of law, for it is clear their leaders would prefer they were ignorant of the law.  

Revolution of mind is the first step in the perpetual motion toward social democratic participation. It is essential that Canadians cultivate critical thinking that enable them to judiciously determine when it is appropriate to be dis-obedient to authority. Question the question. For the love of life as Chris Hedges says – ‘resist, resist, resist!’ By demanding accountability from holders of high office and their total obedience to the law of the people, we will restore sanity and demand more of liberal democracy than totalitarianism in democratic clothing.